Facebook bans white nationalism and white separatism after realizing its no different than white supremacy


Facebook is reversing course and banning white nationalism and white separatism from its platform.

Motherboard reported on Wednesday that Facebook is shifting its policy on white nationalism and white separatism and made the decision to ban them from the platform one day prior. Shortly after Motherboard’s report, Facebook posted a statement, titled “Standing Against Hate,” on its website confirming the policy update.

As part of the policy update, Facebook will also direct users searching for content related to white supremacy on its platform to Life After Hate, a nonprofit organization that provides support and education to help people leave hate groups and movements.


In a screenshot attached to Facebook’s post, the company showcased just how the support link recommendation will look for banned searches for white supremacist content.

Facebook originally allowed content in support of white nationalism and white separatism on the social networking site. In a document leaked to Motherboard last year, the company specifically distinguished those ideologies from white supremacy, which was previously banned from Facebook, in its moderation policies.

“Our policies have long prohibited hateful treatment of people based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity or religion – and that has always included white supremacy,” said Facebook in its statement. “We didn’t originally apply the same rationale to expressions of white nationalism and separatism because we were thinking about broader concepts of nationalism and separatism – things like American pride and Basque separatism, which are an important part of people’s identity.”

The social network reportedly began reviewing these policies later that year after public outcry related to these moderation policies. Facebook consulted with nearly two dozen civil rights groups, academics, and race relations groups and reached a decision after concluding that there is no difference between the three ideologies. 


“We decided that the overlap between white nationalism, white separatism, and white supremacy is so extensive we really can’t make a meaningful distinction between them,” Facebook policy director of counterterrorism Brian Fishman told Motherboard. “That’s because the language and the rhetoric that is used and the ideology that it represents overlaps to a degree that it is not a meaningful distinction.”

According to Facebook, to combat white supremacists and other hate groups, the company will deploy the same type of machine learning and artificial intelligence technology it uses to keep ISIS, Al Qaeda, and other terrorist groups off its platform.

Facebook’s policy change comes less than two weeks after a white supremacist shooter livestreamed video of his terrorist attack on the platform. The shooting left 51 people dead at two separate mosques in New Zealand.

Earlier this week, the French Council of the Muslim Faith filed a lawsuit against Facebook, as well as YouTube, for not removing video of the New Zealand shooting quickly enough.

“Today’s announcement that white nationalist and separatist content will be banned from both Facebook and Instagram is a welcome development,” said Madihha Ahussain of the civil rights group Muslim Advocates in an email statement to Mashable. “Now, the question is: how will Facebook interpret and enforce this new policy to prevent another tragedy like the Christchurch mosque attacks?” 

In Facebook’s leaked internal moderation policy last year, the company classified statements in support of white nationalism or the creation of a white ethno-state as permissible on the platform. It’s currently unclear what other sort of views fall under what the company will view as white supremacy.

“We need to know how Facebook will define white nationalist and white separatist content,” said Ahussain. “Will it include expressions of anti-Muslim, anti-Black, anti-Jewish, anti-immigrant and anti-LGBTQ sentiment — all underlying foundations of white nationalism? If the policy lacks robust, informed and assertive enforcement, it will continue to leave vulnerable communities at the mercy of hate groups. As the horror in New Zealand has once again shown us, hate has deadly consequences.”

Facebook says it will start enforcing this new policy next week.

“For years, Muslim Advocates and other civil rights groups have been advocating for reforms and accountability mechanisms to ensure that Facebook is a safe platform and is used for good, not hate, in the world,” said Ahussain. “We look forward to working with Facebook to ensure that this new policy is fully implemented and enforced to protect all vulnerable communities from hate.”

Mashable has reached out to Facebook for additional information on its updated hate policy and will update this post as soon as we hear back.


UPDATE: March 27, 2019, 5:25 p.m. EDT The racial justice organization Color of Change sent Mashable the following statement from its president, Rashad Robinson:

“Color Of Change alerted Facebook years ago to the growing dangers of white nationalists on its platform, and today, we are glad to see the company’s leadership take this critical step forward in updating its policy on white nationalism. We look forward to continuing our work with Facebook to ensure that the platform’s content moderation guidelines and trainings properly support the updated policy and are informed by  civil rights and racial justice organizations.

Facebook’s update should move Twitter, YouTube, and Amazon to act urgently to stem the growth of white nationalist ideologies, which find space on platforms to spread the violent ideas and rhetoric that inspired the tragic attacks witnessed in Charlottesville, Pittsburgh, and now Christchurch. 

Color Of Change and its 1.5 million members will continue to work with Facebook to ensure the platform is safe for everyone and hold the leadership of all social platforms accountable to making the safety of users from marginalized communities an operational priority.” 




Mashable partner.

Comments

  1. Wow. I wish I were surprised just how many people on here have absolutely no clue what freedom of speech actually means, but unfortunately I'm not.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I dont know how people can defend this sort of behavior under the guise of "Free speech." First of all, facebook is a private company and can run their website however they see fit.
    Im happy these neo nazis are gone. Good riddance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ban that Philippine nationalism, that Korea nationalism, that South Africa nationalism, that Island the Indonesians hold, the Taiwan nationalist, let Facebook write everyone's opinions

    ReplyDelete
  4. So no more stories about Trump?

    ReplyDelete
  5. But allow all the other divisive garbage to proliferate...

    ReplyDelete
  6. https://www.spiked-online.com/.../why-wont-westerners.../...

    ReplyDelete
  7. FFS!!! Banning is unconstitutional, too! It's called censorship/free speech....I despise their rhetoric but they're ALLOWED to say it. OMG...we are all SO FAR off the respective edges!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Singling out any extreme group be it race, ethnicity or religious group is discrimination under the law. They are going to have to be carful how the enforce this new rule.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Europe is going to ban facebook

    ReplyDelete
  10. Why did this take so long?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Should of from day one.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Take em down Facebook!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. I would have thought it would benefit the rest of humanity to separate this lot of tiki-torch bearing louts from the herd and keep them penned up before the infection spreads!

    ReplyDelete
  14. No, Trump keeps showing up in my timeline. Hell, look at the picture you used for this article. ����

    ReplyDelete
  15. Great, no more Scheer in my news feed!

    ReplyDelete
  16. In Canada you have freedom of expression, not free speech. Canadians need to learn the difference.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Racist people: but i thought we had freedom of speech?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Conservative bot says "look at those liberal nazis."

    ReplyDelete
  19. No wonder why trump sticks to twitter!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Freedom of speech means you can't be prosecuted by the law with some exceptions. Facebook is able to choose what content is displayed on their website. The reason the daily stormer is allowed on the interwebs

    ReplyDelete
  21. No more mister nice Facebook guy. "The base" is getting squeezed.

    ReplyDelete
  22. No one is going ANYWHERE...please

    ReplyDelete
  23. Ban BLM it's a racist organization

    ReplyDelete
  24. Bye bye Callahan!!!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Freedom of speech is freedom of speech I might not agree with there views but they have there right to speak there voice even if it's stupid

    ReplyDelete
  26. If you haven't been censored, you're on the wrong side. Thinking people don't censor. Firstly they don't need to because, standing for truth means you're not afraid of other views. Secondly censorship is for evil people. Do Hitler or Stalin ring any bells?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Ban all opinions, ban facebook, ban all political parties and opinions

    ReplyDelete
  28. Fakebook uses this excuse to senor people while not deleting terror pages, other non white racist pages and complete lies that push the liberal agenda.

    ReplyDelete
  29. They banned Alex Jones yet he keeps getting more listeners

    ReplyDelete
  30. They can ban a narrative such as calling it white nationalism but they can't ban American nationalism pride of patriots. Go Trump 2020!

    ReplyDelete
  31. Surely this means banning Trump?

    ReplyDelete
  32. I hope Farrakhan, NOI/FOI and the 5% are also 86ed to start, but really, all anti-MAGA people should be painted as haters and banned for life as well!

    ReplyDelete
  33. Interesting the left has branded Stephen Miller a White Nationalist . How can a Jew be a White Nationalist ? White Nationalist hate jews . I watched the Congressional hearing on this and it seems that false narratives are creating the hate .The democrats have become the left's new Alex Jones

    ReplyDelete
  34. why treat white nationalism and separatism different from other colors? racism?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Ban ALL nationalism while you’re at it if you’re gonna ban one groups. This is complete censorship

    ReplyDelete
  36. If you Google or Bling the Definition, They both have a lot Gray area. It not Clear, Black and White.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Any U.S. company that trades shares on a Wall St is considered a public company, therefore Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Press, and Freedom of Assembly apply to Facebook.
    Did you forget the owner of a bakery was forced against his beliefs by a court order to make a cake for homosexual wedding.
    Hate speech is someone else's right to express themselves, so it actually is protected speech.
    Facebook appears to doing the bidding of whatever political party sends them the most money. They know they are in the wrong, but also know the U.S. government is so messed up it will take them years to catch up with them.

    ReplyDelete
  38. That's dumb and retarded considering fb is overrun with racists on every thread ive ever come across. Good luck with that attempt

    ReplyDelete
  39. You should ban people calling for violence!

    ReplyDelete
  40. I'm no fan of any race that thinks they're better than another, but I'm no fan of unfairness, or anyone else deciding what is or is not acceptable behavior. This is a very slippery slope. Why not focus on Antifa, or ANY liberal hate group for that matter?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Stay informed!