SpaceX, Blue Origin will supply NASA with Moon-landing equipment.

SpaceX, Blue Origin will supply NASA with Moon-landing equipment


Americans are returning to the Moon in 2024, which means NASA's already planning for what it needs to get astronauts safely there.

On Thursday, the space agency announced that three U.S. partners will coordinate to deliver human landing system concepts for the lunar mission known as the Artemis program. That mission, which aims to land the first woman on the Moon, will help the agency to prepare for an eventual Mars trip.

SpaceX, Elon Musk's space transportation company, and Blue Origin, founded by Amazon's Jeff Bezos, were selected along with Dynetics, an Alabama-based company known for its reusable air systems.

Blue Origin will be designing a lander vehicle that will launch from its New Glenn rocket system and the ULA Vulcan launch vehicle. While SpaceX's Starship, a reusable launch vehicle, will work with the company's Super Heavy rocket booster to get humans to the Moon and help deliver cargo to its surface.


For the Artemis program, Starship will be modified for the lunar landscape. SpaceX will also be providing several Starships tailored for different purposes: One will store propellant, another will act as a tanker, while another will transport humans between different locations.


Now that NASA's private suppliers have been officially selected, we're one step closer to bringing humans back to the Moon.

Comments

  1. You mean for the first time .

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think since Trump is really into SPACE FORCE bigly and insists he's oober smart on all things (just ask him), he and Pence should lead by example and go first. They could even get matching hats😉.

    ReplyDelete
  3. People still believe human landed in the moon 50 years ago..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. tragic.������
      50 years ago, when electronic system by electron tube, human "landed" on the moon..
      Why at supercomputer era, human so hard landing to the moon?
      Not logic, right?

      Delete
  4. Good day everybody i am here to share with you my life experience how a great man called Dr goko saved me and my marriage.I have been Married & Barren for 5 years i had no child. i have never been pregnant i was a subject of laughter from my Friends & neighbors, i almost lost my marriage because of this issue.i was so confused that i did not know what to do until i came across this great Dr online and i contacted him at once i was scared weather it was going to work because i never believed things like this before, so i decided to give it a try and i did all what Dr goko asked of me and today to my greatest surprise i took in the first time and i gave birth to a bouncing baby boy and now my marriage that was about crashing before is now restored. my lover now love and want me better, Am so happy for everything that have been happening my life since i met this Dr goko. I want to tell all the women out there who have a similar situation like that the world is not over YET they should dry up their tears and contact this great man and their problem will be gone or are you also having other problems you can also contact Dr goko, here is how you can contact him (Dr.gokospellhome12@gmail. com) or whatsapp him on +2349068679070 Thank Dr goko for everything you did in my marriage. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  5. NASA with the help of companies like Spacex plans to send the first woman to the moon soon in 2024.
    As a part of us, we are ready to question this journey and it is a war on our nation and the other section is ready to launch poems and notice on the moon that will be set on the moon.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think that starship could host a comfortable living environment for astronauts, but a really like dynetics design as well, it looks like it would be a great design

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Starship Enterprise would also be great with matter/ antimatter propulsion but like Space X's Starship are both fiction


      Delete
    2. starship will be ready before slsaurous.

      Delete
    3. You want to put money on that big mouth. You mean the one blows up all that time LOL. Like taking candy from a baby.

      Delete
  7. Looks forward to seeing more of these and the final selection.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looks forward to your analysis of the choices.

      Delete
    2. I feel like I've become much more informed since I started watching your videos, very much looking forward to hearing your thoughts on these designs

      Delete
  8. 3 teams, hope at least two of them will achieve their goals in time

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SLS Rocket uhmmmmm

      Delete
    2. Iff that could happened in future Well Done.Iff...


      Delete
    3. Space Sheep why 2 why not all

      Delete
  9. im excited for what comes after we solve the logistics of staying on the lunar surface. mining/research projects is gonna launch us into the next stage of our evolution by making us a space faring species

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Dynetics" - Whew! I thought they said "Dianetics"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Its dialectics man! you can't go to space on fractions!"

      Delete
  11. That is the coolest thing ever imagine how much stress the astronauts have to go through big respect

    ReplyDelete
  12. Dynetic's low slung design looks like an Eagle from Space 1999.

    ReplyDelete
  13. About a third of an Eagle - it needs another one bolted to the back...


    ReplyDelete
  14. Good call with removing the flaps from starship. Means they can shave weight off, because this will likely just be used for going back and forth to the lunar gateway, so they never have to worry about atmosphereic reentry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Without some kind of external drag (not lift) bodies, belly-flop descents followed by vertical landings would require much more propellant plus side-thrusters to land on Earth. For the Moon side thrusters are necessity. Mars landing would be feasible without them.


      Delete
    2. I wonder if SpaceX proposed that Starship become both lander AND gateway. It's big enough to also serve as a gateway. Either way, it doesn't appear that it will return to Earth.

      Delete
    3. This Starship variant is only for Lunar transport in every part of the colony.


      Delete
    4. Good point. So they should have different versions of starship for different mission profiles like mars starship needs those flaps since mars has an atmosphere and moon starship might or might not need it based on whether it is intended to return to earth or not


      Delete
  15. I’m just excited for better footage from the lunar surface.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Looking forward to 2024 NASA.

    One small step was made. One giant leap was accomplished. Now let’s shoot for the stars!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. After that giant leap, NASA spent 50 years tripping- over its own feet.


      Delete
    2. So exploring other planets remotely, the ISS, the Hubble and the Shuttle program were nothing?

      Delete
  17. Now that NASA has SpaceX involved, they might meet their schedule.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Wow.. Starship... so impressive..

    ReplyDelete
  19. Go with StarShip

    ReplyDelete
  20. no need to play backgrund music

    ReplyDelete
  21. As a teenager, I really hope to work for nasa some day, and I know there are many other teenagers with a passion for space as well. Our generation has hope.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you can do it man. my brother went to college wanting to get into space stuff and he ended up working at spacex with his best friend.

      Delete
    2. how many years did that take

      Delete
  22. i want to see starship on the moon

    ReplyDelete
  23. When NASA is done playing political games, I want to see it come back, get put on another Heavy and sent to Mars!


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They’re supposed to do a demo landing in 2022, so not too long of a wait.


      Delete
  24. I suppose starship will be tested so rigorously by then that it's the best choice.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Landing in 4 years with a lander that doesn't exist yet? I like that 1960s boldness and optimism, hope it works out.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I"m liking the "low slung" approach.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Stay informed!