Researchers find first-of-its-kind armored dinosaur remains in Argentina | Mashable.

Researchers find first-of-its-kind armored dinosaur remains in Argentina

Paleontologists estimate that it's been 100 million years since this dinosaur last roamed the Earth.

This computer rendering provides a detailed look into what Jakapil Kaniukura may have looked like in 100 milion years ago Credit: Gabriel Díaz Yantén

Researchers have found the remains of a previously unknown species of armored dinosaur in Argentina — the first of its kind to be discovered in South America, according to Science Alert.

The dinosaur, named Jakapil kaniukura, is said to have been bipedal with a short beak and rows of bony disk-shaped armor along its neck, back, and down to its tail. A well-protected species, Jakapil is a part of the thyreophoran species alongside other armored dinos like the stegosaurus and the ankylosaurus.

The discovery was made by paleontologists at the Félix de Azara Natural History Foundation in Argentina. The team uncovered the partial remains of Jakapil in the Río Negro province in northern Patagonia, Science Alert reports. Lead paleontologist Sebastián Apesteguía wrote that Jakapil represents the "first definitive thyreophoran species from the Argentinian Patagonia."

A holotype of Jakapil kaniukura
A holotype of Jakapil kaniukura Credit: Nature.Com

Researchers wrote in the journal Scientific Reports that Jakapil was an ancient species of thyreophoran, however, the remains found date back between 97 million and 94 million years ago during the Cretaceous period. The Cretaceous period is also known as the last era of the dinosaurs.

SEE ALSO: Scientists discover ancient shark swimming in a really strange place 

This is a surprising outcome as Apesteguía and his team note in their paper that "these older types of thyreophorans seem to have gone extinct by the Middle Jurassic." They also added that they were surprised an ancient lineage of thyreophorans survived all the way into the Late Cretaceous in South America.

Thanks to this computer reconstruction above from Gabriel Díaz Yantén, a Chilean paleoartist and paleontology student at Río Negro National University, you can see what this ancient species may have looked like when it was alive.

Apesteguía and his team measured Jakapil out to be 5 feet long with a weight between 9 and 15 pounds — the size of an average house cat. With teeth similar to the stegosaurus, researchers also believe Jakapil to also have been a plant-eating species.

Comments

  1. Good keep it that way! 🚫🦖

    I saw this documentary about a city in Europe, where the dinosaurs were getting smarter and faster. I guess Chris Pratt was vacationing there and he barely escaped.
    .
    So keep them outta North America. I mean you think SARS, Covid or Monkeypox is deadly. These giant lizards 🦎are way worse.

    Just to be safe, I had to put down my Kimono Dragon this morning. Goodbye Viserion, you were a loyal friend. Yet it was you or me, so it had to be done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://media1.tenor.co/images/1a9a8483b21a7953e6985c515ad85f8d/tenor.gif?itemid=20790957

      Delete
  2. It's been sooner, he's in the white House

    ReplyDelete
  3. The majestic boludosaurus

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. and how this affects Boca?

      Delete
    2. sure, the Bocaraptor’s great, but the Galliplodocus is king.

      https://media1.tenor.co/images/77b8791101ed3f9a1386f428075cfcd6/tenor.gif?c=VjFfZmFjZWJvb2tfd2ViY29tbWVudHM&itemid=18199469

      Delete
  4. If you believe Dino’s was here 100 million years ago… nd not in most recent age your bogus ash

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. get a haircut and get a real job.

      Delete
    2. maybe his cocaine ravaged brain makes him not to see he needs to fix his hair lol

      Delete
    3. for you to be a melanin person your an embarrassment

      Delete
    4. https://media1.tenor.co/images/837287881edbcfb9bff840eb6096dbea/tenor.gif?itemid=16804319

      Delete
    5. Wow, how can anyone argue with such well-supported reasoning and so eloquently stated, bogus ash indeed.

      Delete
    6. go back to school and finish bro.

      Delete
    7. 2006 scientist found out the fossils are not just rock but also bone with red blood cells but hey that's only trex...

      Delete
    8. the only embarrassment here is you. To your entire species.

      Delete
    9. Ok John Hammond.

      Delete
  5. That's an exceptionally low amount of actual skeleton to draw such conclusions

    ReplyDelete
  6. Were the scientists there 100 million years ago?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, the dinosaurs were, that’s how we know. And to be honest, your pfp looks like you were too.

      Delete
  7. How do they know the name of that animal is dinosaur?

    ReplyDelete
  8. 🎼🎵🎶What kinda kids like armored dinosaurs?🎶

    ReplyDelete
  9. In south America creatures animal coming back from 100,000 year ago living on earth.......

    ReplyDelete
  10. I am so shocked by this amazing video??? http://youtube.com/watch?app=web353BZ5B1w&v=VE15dU4CHqQ&feature=ySFGnlOXZ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You give money for freee, thank you.

      Delete
    2. "Video unavailable"
      "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Web3 Solidity"

      Delete
  11. mashable Posted...

    ReplyDelete
  12. New armored Dino just dropped

    ReplyDelete
  13. For a change, something was not made in China

    ReplyDelete
  14. The lesser known "Smugasaurus".

    ReplyDelete
  15. That’s a incredible discovery

    ReplyDelete
  16. here's the original article.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-15535-6

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yeah, see figure 4.

      Delete
    2. I looked closely, I'm saying to myself that they are experts and used computers to place the fragments. We've been hearing for years that dinos probably had feathers, so we'll probably be hearing soon that Oops, they goofed, and this is a juvenile of a known species of a different time. 🤷‍♀️ The artist created a cute little face, though.

      Delete
    3. yeah, agreed. Check out the tyrannosaurus skin print they found that reversed theories about it having feathers. It's all extrapolation, but for the amount of fragments here, this is a LOT of guess work.

      https://www.smithsonianmag.com/.../t-rex-skin-was-not.../

      Delete
    4. it must be frustrating to live life looking for clues to describe something that's never going to reveal a specimen as the glaciers melt.

      Delete
  17. Caught that Pokémon years ago

    ReplyDelete
  18. So like a turtle or armadillo?

    ReplyDelete
  19. WRONG ❣️❣️❣️❣️‼

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. give anything to refute it then

      Delete
  20. The earth is not that old

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It’s much older.

      Delete
    2. are you sure about that

      Delete
    3. Nope a little over 6000yrs

      Delete
    4. I'm sure things have changed since you were in school, but you've had plenty of time to catch up. Earth is about 4.5 billion years old.

      Delete
    5. u would know lol

      Delete
    6. yea but that's 4.5 billion requires faith to believe. That's a religion.

      Delete
    7. yes things have changed since we were educated with the truth, there have been so many lies and conspiracies pushed into the public school agenda,

      Delete
    8. obviously, you believe in evolution and not creation.

      Delete
    9. No, it has evidence.

      Delete
    10. 4.5 billion years old is pretty old.

      Delete
    11. There is evidence from geology,astronomy, chemistry and physics. They agree

      Delete
    12. lol, no, it doesn't require "faith." Faith is believing in something without evidence that it is real. The scientific process isn't a religion; religious people just like to conflate the two because they can't actually refute science with their faith.

      Delete
    13. So actual scientific evidence from people with doctorates that have studied their entire lives is false but believing in an archaic invisible man in the sky that does everything through magic is the truth?

      Delete
    14. yeah, conservatives have done a lot of that

      Delete
    15. There’s evidence of Mesopotamian hunter-gatherer societies since 10,000 BC. There’s an archeological site in Kenya called Lomekwi that has found stone tools that are 3.3 million years old.

      Science books are meant to be read. They’re not just for decoration.

      Delete
    16. because evolution is a proven fact and creationism is not.

      Delete
    17. what does my faith have to do with evolution? I don't care of the earth is young or old. You on the other hand have been brainwashed to only accept old. I would believe it's not faith if it didn't require so much to believe. Circular reasoning is not science. Evolution is a cult. Science shows a young earth(not that I care it's not old). Radio metric dating is based off assumptions and is not accurate. It requires the atmosphere to have always stayed the same which science shows otherwise. You pipe dream evolution is clearly falling apart everyday. You also look so silly promoting it.

      Delete
    18. I have seen Jesus. Never seen evolution or proof the earth is old. 2006 marry one of your "scientist" cut open trex fossil. She found blood cell remnants from trex and it was at that moment we started questioning you doctorates.

      Delete
    19. there is also evidence for young earth too. You can find evidence for anything you believe in. Mainstream uses circular reasoning and assumption to get half life dates. They can't just test a half life. You gotta guess the other 99% bit since you guys don't ever do radio metric dating and don't understand the math you won't ever really know

      Delete
    20. You use the layers to date the rocks and the rocks to date the layers like a giant circus and requires heaps of faith.

      Delete
    21. Some in the Evo cult will point to "transitional" fossils as proof of evolution and the hard core believers say too much time has passed to observe one. Which side of your cult do you stand on?

      Delete
    22. "Evo cult?" That's a new one, lol! Look, you have clearly shown you don't understand the science you're--very poorly--trying to counter. A lack of understanding on your part doesn't do anything to prove your point. Quite the contrary, actually.

      Also, if you have "seen Jesus," you should seek a mental health professional. Especially if the Jesus you saw was white.

      Delete
    23. Jesus is not white and never was. That's your faith.

      Delete
    24. Jesus is a middle eastern Jewish man. Middle eastern Jewish men from his time period were dark skin not light.

      Delete
    25. I don't take council from strangers and I think that you don't understand the science becuz if you did you would realize they havnt been upfort with you.

      Delete
    26. So are you team transitional fossil? Or are you team to much time has passed for a transitional fossil? 🙂

      Delete

Post a Comment

Stay informed!