I was reading the whole article, then I got to this part!!! Amazing.
"The goal of sharing this news is to shed light on important conversations we need to have about privacy, protection, and responsibility in the digital age. Let's remain vigilant and mindful of the media we consume and support."
I think it comes down to privacy and republican’s supposedly being “small government”, and yet they’re constantly intruding and putting in policies that are bigger government. You remember the Ashley Madison hack that exposed millions of people?
I was reading the entire article, and thinking, "Is Mashable against the ban on pornography?" But then, if you read carefully, it's not about being against it. Even though the post leans more towards the negative side of the ban on pornography, that's not quite it. It's about defending pornography the right way. There are people who think, "If you're going to ban it, ban it properly, ban it 100%," because what they do only encourages people to consume it more, like "forbidden fruit." The more they say no, the more they make you want to do it. So, it's not about being against the ban, but rather banning it completely.
Of course, it's a start. If news like this reaches more and more people, it will generate a lot of buzz and draw people's attention to this, because we know that everything happens in this horrific environment, from child trafficking to child exploitation to so many other disgusting things that I feel like vomiting just typing this... But anyway, that's what I understood from the article, and it became even clearer when I came across this sentence here:
"The goal of sharing this news is to shed light on important conversations we need to have about privacy, protection, and responsibility in the digital age. Let's remain vigilant and mindful of the media we consume and support."
The people pushing these laws have been pretty open about their intent -- declaring any accurate representation of LGBTQ+ people inherently "harmful to minors" and trying to eliminate us from the internet entirely.
This cancer must be completely banned, think about how many perverts, how many old people don't watch porn of children and imagine so much rubbish, true pedophiles.
Parents have plenty of those already: it's their fault for not useing them. Every device, every isp, every service has safeguards in place for parents to use if they can be bothered.
No. What parents need is time. You can't really do parenting well if you leave home at 6am and only comes back 8pm. You get 2 hours to be with the children before everybody going to sleep. Impossible to do parenting. If both parents spend so much time at the job or commuting the kids are, for most practical purposes, orphans. No technological solution will solve that.
What we parents need is shorter work hours and less commuting. And an economy good enough for one of the parents work only half of the time. But the society isn't ready for this conversation. Maybe it will be once the demographic collapse crashes the real estate market and the stock market.
Banning VPN ain’t fixing the root. If gov’s real goal is protecting kids, then the bigger issue’s family time, work-life balance, and economics. Parents stretched thin = kids raised by screens.
Tech crackdowns just mask systemic failings instead of solving them.
But how can we maximize profits if we don't keep our wage slaves working around the clock?
Guys, please help. My wife said she'd sleep with Bezos again if I don't get her a yacht this year for her birthday, but my drones are already working 12 hour shifts with no OT or benefits. What other corners can I cut?
I work from home, my wife works from home, and our kids are in a virtual school. So, we are all home all the time and I still feel like there isn't enough time to get things done and manage. I use all the built in tools, but those tools are limited. I don't expect them to be perfect, but they can only do so much. So yeah, we need time for our families. However that's implemented, we just need time. To expand on that, honestly, non-parents need time too. How do we expect to continue to have a next generation if we don't allow workers to have time to live.
I’ve lived in a diverse range of socioeconomic situations around a large variety of people, and I’ve never met a single family where both parents work 14 hour days. Also 2 hours is more than enough time to set up parental controls on an iPad. Yes more time would help parents but there are plenty of parents choosing to not put in the time they have.
It exists in some cases but overwhelmingly the failures of parents aren’t because of that. I’m curious what the situation was for 10 day gaps? That’s a lot of time. If you’re comfortable sharing what the home life was like I meant it when I said I hadn’t seen it so a new perspective is always welcome.
One parent worked two jobs. Gone at 3pm home at 830am. Step worked 3pm until 12a. I was home from 430p and went to bed at 11 or so.
Summer was a but better, but parent slept 9-2 and step got up at 1 to leave at 3.
I started minding myself somewhat at 6 (school days) and they stopped bothering with any type of summer sitter altogether around 9. I had my first job at 10, taking care of other children as a Mother's Helper.
Home life was a lot like being an adult without a job or car. I ate what I wanted, watched what I wanted, rode my bike if I wanted. We had an old SNES, so I played that a lot. I got into retro TV too, thanks to Nick at Nite + TV Land. I had a couple friends who had similar but different situations but spent 95% of my time alone until I got a computer and started making internet friends I converted into IRL after I moved out at 16 and went full nomad.
Parental controls aren’t the end all be all but if you havnt even done that basic step then you aren’t even trying and only 39% of parents report having done that. And the overwhelming majority of parents do have an amount of time to parent. Yes we can make improvements to how society runs but a lot of parents are also blaming there short comings on society. I know dozens of parents who have time to parent and choose not. Go to any affluent neighbor and you’ll find a whole bunch of neglected shit bag children.
This is the "unique victim" problem that society is facing nowadays.
The modern unique victim has it worse than anyone ever did.
"Don't you understand!!!!!???!!! Don't you realize how hard I have it!!???!!!"
Your kids barely leave the fucking house. When they do, it's in such a supervised state they may as well be wearing mittens and earmuffs in a rubber room.
Never mind discipline either, there are pills for that. School has become a complete fucking joke.
But please, tell me how it's impossible for you to set parental controls on your kids devices.
"Today's technology requires parents to spend hours of extra administration work"
So you're telling me parents have to spend hours of time to attend to their kids needs? 😱
Dedicate time to either learning how to stay ahead in this cat and mouse game that it will inevitably become as you try to curb them from technology and growth... Or you know... Systematically teach them all this knowledge yourself, before they find out about it anyways from little Cartman down the street, whose parents don't care about certain "spooky" adult topics and openly discussion it with them.
If you have a smart kid and you try to cat and mouse them, I guarantee you the mouse(kid) will win/come out on top...luckily you positively contributed to making their power level stronger through adversity.
Making the government police every adult, because you want to create an imaginary shield around your kid that won't actually work at the end of the day... Is wrong.
I rather us fund gov programs for teaching parents what to do, then to fund government overreach.
Above all, they have the possibility of not giving their children smartphones. That's where the 'problem' has come from. If that really is why all of this is being implemented.
I managed to grow up with absolute unmonitored access to the internet for as long as I felt like being on it, and I got my first smartphone at like 22. We had a PC and broadband internet, and we were far from the only ones.
This was already a problem before smartphones were even common for adults, let alone kids. There have always been parents who don't give a shit what their kids find or do after they let them loose online, since the internet was invented. All the smartphones did was make it a portable problem.
I'm 36 now, there weren't as many of us with that privilege, the web was nothing like it is now, and most importantly, there weren't all of these damn social media apps. They are the problem.
I'm 32, myself. I was spending my time on proto-social media like Deviantart back then and there were definitely a lot of kids on there despite the 13+ rule. And not to be gross, but suppressed teenage me spent a lot of time on sexually explicit content that was very easily accessed by kids.
I'm just saying that a version of these problems people have with kids being online have always existed with internet access, on some scale.
Again, we were a small percentage of the general child/teen population that were online at that time, before smartphones and all the apps that go with them. In the early 2000's, I would be surprised if over 10% of kids had such open access to the web. And even those that did had a 56k connection and xx hour AOL cds, and parents getting annoyed because you were blocking the phone line, it wasn't particularily easy.
Children and teenagers do not need access to the likes of Snapchat, Tiktok, Facebook, Twitter, or whatever other apps exist, no matter how much they think that they do. Allowing them to have access to these things has caused the 'problem' that is now being used to implement these liberty-reducing laws. And that is on the parents to monitor, not me, nor for a huge slice of society.
This angers me deeply. I have installed in my 13th year old brother devices, the parental controls so i can monitor and prevented him from acess unwanted content.
When I try to have my parent involved (seeing that i dont live with them) in that, they allways say for me to keep doing it because "i am more acostumed to it."
I have been doing this for years now, and I've prevented some bad things from doing so. It's not hard. it takes 5 minutes to set up. With today's tech, it can be done remotely (whenever my brothers wants to install an app, I get requests that I can approve or not) and prevents so much harm.
The mais problem here are the parent (mainly the older generation one, from the 70s and 80s) that don't belive that the internet can be dangerous if isomething bad doesn't happend to their kids.
I know that between work, chores, and all at the time for the kids is few and far between, but the beauty of parental controls is that it locks the content and waits for the parent approval. The kid will not access the content until a parent reviews it, whether that today or tomorrow.
I agree with you. It's a two fold problem though with parents being scared of parenting and parents being scared to let their children learn and grow. I grew up with strict rules and I knew the punishments if I talked back. Now? Kids talk back to teachers and people of authority like they are trash. It is wild! And what do the parents do? They yell at the teachers for doing what the parents should have done in the first place.
Guess what, kids will drink, and smoke, and look at boobies online. There is no way to stop it and even if we could, why Should we? I am not saying Expose them to things. I am not saying have safe guards in place. But what is next? Locking the child in a dark room for their own safety in order not to expose them to anything bad?
Yeah, all my teacher friends complain about the discipline thing constantly. It all stems from the fault that there is only so much they can do because the parents are shit and most school districts will give you a thousand chances before they kick you out.
It truly is sad. Parents don't want to be like their parents so they are now too passive. There was an interesting article I read that talked about how it's actually related to therapy and how they had caused people to ignore/cut out the bad instead of facing it. I doubt there is a single cause to this systemic issue but I do think parents need to grow up and step up.
If you think your average parent has time for their kids these days you are mistaken. Every single person I know with kids is a duel income family and if the kids arnt in school their in daycare 5 to 6 days a week.
All of this shits connected. People that don't have time for their kids arnt influencing them, those kids turn to what they can which is goverment carers and peers AND the internet which I think is a driving factor in these western nation crack down on internet availability.
Kids growing up knowing nothing but parents working and what their told in schools don't question why.
That’s the thing, soon they will say the parents of the children are not equipped to properly raise them and the government will take and raise them. Because they’re “all our children”.
here's a novel idea - how about having the parents, you know... parent? And consequences for those parents who, well.. don't?
oh that's right, because it was never about protecting kids. It was about spying on what the public are up to and you're upset that people know easy ways around your snooping?
These people are morons, they will trample all over privacy and security, say it's to protect children (biggest lie ever) when really they just want to lay the ground work for total tracking of everything everyone does online.
You guys need to push back HARD against this because we all know this isn't about the children. If this becomes commonplace anywhere it'll spread like wildfire and catch the rest of the world up in the age of anti-privacy that seems to be coming.
Yea this is more about spying then thinking of the children. Mostly adults use VPNs or teens looking to pirate media, they just want to make sure you are well behaved and don't have wrong think or speak.
.webp)
I was reading the whole article, then I got to this part!!! Amazing.
ReplyDelete"The goal of sharing this news is to shed light on important conversations we need to have about privacy, protection, and responsibility in the digital age. Let's remain vigilant and mindful of the media we consume and support."
Thank you!
DeleteThe entire article is designed to get to this point.
And just like that, conservatives learn how to use VPN
ReplyDeleteThe electoral college got us Project 2025
ReplyDeleteThis is why we call these states "fly over" states.
ReplyDeletebecause they dont want kids watching porn? People who want kids watching porn, we call them "Pedophiles".
DeleteFigured this was something both sides could agree on.
I think it comes down to privacy and republican’s supposedly being “small government”, and yet they’re constantly intruding and putting in policies that are bigger government. You remember the Ashley Madison hack that exposed millions of people?
Deleteso I guess those states that have extremely few gun laws just want their children to shoot themselves and are "pro death"?
Deleteas if there aren’t billions of other adult content sites ppl might use instead
ReplyDeleteRepublicans are mad they don’t show the porn they prefer… iykyk 😂
ReplyDeleteNot my porn!
ReplyDeleteNoooooo
DeleteTrumpers are the dumbest people in America
ReplyDeleteSo dumb and pointless.
ReplyDeleteRATHER our CHILDREN watches MURDER and KILLER and violence on cartoon network and movies ? wtf your people are ignorant as can be and i am #for REALE
ReplyDeleteI learned about my first murder from Caine in the Bible. Diddnt know that was something someone had free will to do untill that moment. Crazy
Deleteohhhhhh
Deletewhat's wrong with that?
Deleteyou can just tell us you don’t read books.🤣🤣
DeleteI was reading the entire article, and thinking, "Is Mashable against the ban on pornography?" But then, if you read carefully, it's not about being against it. Even though the post leans more towards the negative side of the ban on pornography, that's not quite it. It's about defending pornography the right way. There are people who think, "If you're going to ban it, ban it properly, ban it 100%," because what they do only encourages people to consume it more, like "forbidden fruit." The more they say no, the more they make you want to do it. So, it's not about being against the ban, but rather banning it completely.
ReplyDeleteOf course, it's a start. If news like this reaches more and more people, it will generate a lot of buzz and draw people's attention to this, because we know that everything happens in this horrific environment, from child trafficking to child exploitation to so many other disgusting things that I feel like vomiting just typing this... But anyway, that's what I understood from the article, and it became even clearer when I came across this sentence here:
"The goal of sharing this news is to shed light on important conversations we need to have about privacy, protection, and responsibility in the digital age. Let's remain vigilant and mindful of the media we consume and support."
💯
DeleteThat's it, right?
DeleteMay they block all this cancer from the face of the earth
ReplyDeleteThat's basically a list of all the narrow hate-fueled states. That worst states, all in one list.
ReplyDeleteThe people pushing these laws have been pretty open about their intent -- declaring any accurate representation of LGBTQ+ people inherently "harmful to minors" and trying to eliminate us from the internet entirely.
ReplyDeletethank god
ReplyDeletefuck this cancer, porn is cancer
ReplyDeleteThis cancer must be completely banned, think about how many perverts, how many old people don't watch porn of children and imagine so much rubbish, true pedophiles.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteOh the children.... think of the children... everything is being done to keep the kids safe these days
ReplyDeleteExcept giving parents the tools and time to effectively parent, it seems.
DeleteParents have plenty of those already: it's their fault for not useing them. Every device, every isp, every service has safeguards in place for parents to use if they can be bothered.
DeleteNo. What parents need is time. You can't really do parenting well if you leave home at 6am and only comes back 8pm. You get 2 hours to be with the children before everybody going to sleep. Impossible to do parenting. If both parents spend so much time at the job or commuting the kids are, for most practical purposes, orphans. No technological solution will solve that.
DeleteWhat we parents need is shorter work hours and less commuting. And an economy good enough for one of the parents work only half of the time. But the society isn't ready for this conversation. Maybe it will be once the demographic collapse crashes the real estate market and the stock market.
Banning VPN ain’t fixing the root. If gov’s real goal is protecting kids, then the bigger issue’s family time, work-life balance, and economics. Parents stretched thin = kids raised by screens.
DeleteTech crackdowns just mask systemic failings instead of solving them.
Masking systemic failings is modern world's trademark
DeleteBut how can we maximize profits if we don't keep our wage slaves working around the clock?
DeleteGuys, please help. My wife said she'd sleep with Bezos again if I don't get her a yacht this year for her birthday, but my drones are already working 12 hour shifts with no OT or benefits. What other corners can I cut?
I agree. It sucks with two kids and we both have to work
DeleteI work from home, my wife works from home, and our kids are in a virtual school. So, we are all home all the time and I still feel like there isn't enough time to get things done and manage. I use all the built in tools, but those tools are limited. I don't expect them to be perfect, but they can only do so much. So yeah, we need time for our families. However that's implemented, we just need time. To expand on that, honestly, non-parents need time too. How do we expect to continue to have a next generation if we don't allow workers to have time to live.
DeleteYeah that’s what parents need, even more benefits and privileges that everyone else doesn’t get.
DeleteLearn how to setup your child’s technology or don’t give them technology, how about that.
I’ve lived in a diverse range of socioeconomic situations around a large variety of people, and I’ve never met a single family where both parents work 14 hour days. Also 2 hours is more than enough time to set up parental controls on an iPad. Yes more time would help parents but there are plenty of parents choosing to not put in the time they have.
DeleteHey what's up. I used to go up to 10 days without seeing an adult in my home. We exist!
DeleteBut I 100% agree that parental controls are worth a parent losing an hour of sleep one night to set up.
It exists in some cases but overwhelmingly the failures of parents aren’t because of that. I’m curious what the situation was for 10 day gaps? That’s a lot of time. If you’re comfortable sharing what the home life was like I meant it when I said I hadn’t seen it so a new perspective is always welcome.
Delete
DeleteOne parent worked two jobs. Gone at 3pm home at 830am. Step worked 3pm until 12a. I was home from 430p and went to bed at 11 or so.
Summer was a but better, but parent slept 9-2 and step got up at 1 to leave at 3.
I started minding myself somewhat at 6 (school days) and they stopped bothering with any type of summer sitter altogether around 9. I had my first job at 10, taking care of other children as a Mother's Helper.
Home life was a lot like being an adult without a job or car. I ate what I wanted, watched what I wanted, rode my bike if I wanted. We had an old SNES, so I played that a lot. I got into retro TV too, thanks to Nick at Nite + TV Land. I had a couple friends who had similar but different situations but spent 95% of my time alone until I got a computer and started making internet friends I converted into IRL after I moved out at 16 and went full nomad.
When was this, what were the jobs, and how many children in the family?
Deleteparental controls help but are not the solution. you are still trying to solve a sociological problem using tech. It never works.
DeleteParental controls aren’t the end all be all but if you havnt even done that basic step then you aren’t even trying and only 39% of parents report having done that. And the overwhelming majority of parents do have an amount of time to parent. Yes we can make improvements to how society runs but a lot of parents are also blaming there short comings on society. I know dozens of parents who have time to parent and choose not. Go to any affluent neighbor and you’ll find a whole bunch of neglected shit bag children.
DeleteWhat about time and resources?
DeleteBelongs to the shareholders
DeleteJust as you and I do, haha
DeleteFeudalism "All hail the lords!"
DeleteUS: No, that's bad!
Democratic Socialism
US:. "No, that's cOmMuNiSm"
Capitalism "All hail the shareholders"
US: Now that's more like it. Give us a "klepocrat" king while your at it...
Spoken like a person with no experience raising children.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteThis is the "unique victim" problem that society is facing nowadays.
DeleteThe modern unique victim has it worse than anyone ever did.
"Don't you understand!!!!!???!!! Don't you realize how hard I have it!!???!!!"
Your kids barely leave the fucking house. When they do, it's in such a supervised state they may as well be wearing mittens and earmuffs in a rubber room.
Never mind discipline either, there are pills for that. School has become a complete fucking joke.
But please, tell me how it's impossible for you to set parental controls on your kids devices.
"Today's technology requires parents to spend hours of extra administration work"
DeleteSo you're telling me parents have to spend hours of time to attend to their kids needs? 😱
Dedicate time to either learning how to stay ahead in this cat and mouse game that it will inevitably become as you try to curb them from technology and growth... Or you know... Systematically teach them all this knowledge yourself, before they find out about it anyways from little Cartman down the street, whose parents don't care about certain "spooky" adult topics and openly discussion it with them.
If you have a smart kid and you try to cat and mouse them, I guarantee you the mouse(kid) will win/come out on top...luckily you positively contributed to making their power level stronger through adversity.
Making the government police every adult, because you want to create an imaginary shield around your kid that won't actually work at the end of the day... Is wrong.
I rather us fund gov programs for teaching parents what to do, then to fund government overreach.
Above all, they have the possibility of not giving their children smartphones. That's where the 'problem' has come from. If that really is why all of this is being implemented.
DeleteI managed to grow up with absolute unmonitored access to the internet for as long as I felt like being on it, and I got my first smartphone at like 22. We had a PC and broadband internet, and we were far from the only ones.
DeleteThis was already a problem before smartphones were even common for adults, let alone kids. There have always been parents who don't give a shit what their kids find or do after they let them loose online, since the internet was invented. All the smartphones did was make it a portable problem.
I'm 36 now, there weren't as many of us with that privilege, the web was nothing like it is now, and most importantly, there weren't all of these damn social media apps. They are the problem.
DeleteI'm 32, myself. I was spending my time on proto-social media like Deviantart back then and there were definitely a lot of kids on there despite the 13+ rule. And not to be gross, but suppressed teenage me spent a lot of time on sexually explicit content that was very easily accessed by kids.
DeleteI'm just saying that a version of these problems people have with kids being online have always existed with internet access, on some scale.
But it wasn't in your pocket 24/7 which I think adds to (not creates) the problem.
DeleteYeah, which is why in my first comment I specifically said that smartphones have just made the problem portable.
DeleteAgain, we were a small percentage of the general child/teen population that were online at that time, before smartphones and all the apps that go with them. In the early 2000's, I would be surprised if over 10% of kids had such open access to the web. And even those that did had a 56k connection and xx hour AOL cds, and parents getting annoyed because you were blocking the phone line, it wasn't particularily easy.
DeleteChildren and teenagers do not need access to the likes of Snapchat, Tiktok, Facebook, Twitter, or whatever other apps exist, no matter how much they think that they do. Allowing them to have access to these things has caused the 'problem' that is now being used to implement these liberty-reducing laws. And that is on the parents to monitor, not me, nor for a huge slice of society.
This angers me deeply. I have installed in my 13th year old brother devices, the parental controls so i can monitor and prevented him from acess unwanted content.
DeleteWhen I try to have my parent involved (seeing that i dont live with them) in that, they allways say for me to keep doing it because "i am more acostumed to it."
I have been doing this for years now, and I've prevented some bad things from doing so. It's not hard. it takes 5 minutes to set up. With today's tech, it can be done remotely (whenever my brothers wants to install an app, I get requests that I can approve or not) and prevents so much harm.
The mais problem here are the parent (mainly the older generation one, from the 70s and 80s) that don't belive that the internet can be dangerous if isomething bad doesn't happend to their kids.
I know that between work, chores, and all at the time for the kids is few and far between, but the beauty of parental controls is that it locks the content and waits for the parent approval. The kid will not access the content until a parent reviews it, whether that today or tomorrow.
I agree with you. It's a two fold problem though with parents being scared of parenting and parents being scared to let their children learn and grow. I grew up with strict rules and I knew the punishments if I talked back. Now? Kids talk back to teachers and people of authority like they are trash. It is wild! And what do the parents do? They yell at the teachers for doing what the parents should have done in the first place.
DeleteGuess what, kids will drink, and smoke, and look at boobies online. There is no way to stop it and even if we could, why Should we? I am not saying Expose them to things. I am not saying have safe guards in place. But what is next? Locking the child in a dark room for their own safety in order not to expose them to anything bad?
It's wild that anyone thinks that this is ok.
Yeah, all my teacher friends complain about the discipline thing constantly. It all stems from the fault that there is only so much they can do because the parents are shit and most school districts will give you a thousand chances before they kick you out.
DeleteIt truly is sad. Parents don't want to be like their parents so they are now too passive. There was an interesting article I read that talked about how it's actually related to therapy and how they had caused people to ignore/cut out the bad instead of facing it. I doubt there is a single cause to this systemic issue but I do think parents need to grow up and step up.
Delete
DeleteIf you think your average parent has time for their kids these days you are mistaken. Every single person I know with kids is a duel income family and if the kids arnt in school their in daycare 5 to 6 days a week.
All of this shits connected. People that don't have time for their kids arnt influencing them, those kids turn to what they can which is goverment carers and peers AND the internet which I think is a driving factor in these western nation crack down on internet availability.
Kids growing up knowing nothing but parents working and what their told in schools don't question why.
What are you? A communist?
DeleteThat’s the thing, soon they will say the parents of the children are not equipped to properly raise them and the government will take and raise them. Because they’re “all our children”.
DeleteAt that point just take the kids from the hospital dont even let the parents see them
Delete(For the US ar least) Theyll do everything except call out the party most responsible
Deletehttps://www.reddit.com/r/RepublicanPedophiles/s/CDactrJhiq
When they say it’s about the children..it’s not
ReplyDeleteKeep the kids in front of screens tho.
ReplyDeleteTry stopping me paying for Mullvad with Monero.
ReplyDeleteThey're trying to exert control but there's always ways around.
Children don’t have money. Children can’t buy a monthly subscription to a reputable VPN company. This is all a lie.
ReplyDeleteThis' never been a moral panic, its always been aiming aiming for far sinister goal if its not obvious. The UK about to become Orwellian dysto
DeleteThere aren't many kids buying vpn....these are just lies by their oppressive totalitarian gov to ban them
ReplyDeletehere's a novel idea - how about having the parents, you know... parent? And consequences for those parents who, well.. don't?
ReplyDeleteoh that's right, because it was never about protecting kids. It was about spying on what the public are up to and you're upset that people know easy ways around your snooping?
These people are morons, they will trample all over privacy and security, say it's to protect children (biggest lie ever) when really they just want to lay the ground work for total tracking of everything everyone does online.
ReplyDeleteYou guys need to push back HARD against this because we all know this isn't about the children. If this becomes commonplace anywhere it'll spread like wildfire and catch the rest of the world up in the age of anti-privacy that seems to be coming.
ReplyDeleteImagine parents doing their one fucking job?
ReplyDeleteThey never do.
DeleteYea this is more about spying then thinking of the children. Mostly adults use VPNs or teens looking to pirate media, they just want to make sure you are well behaved and don't have wrong think or speak.
ReplyDeleteI use VPNs for the same reason and I'm a 50 year old man
ReplyDeleteYou're not one of the pedos, right? 🤢🤮
DeleteMaybe the parents need to do their job somewhere down this pipeline
ReplyDeleteIf you're old enough to navigate a VPN, you're old enough to be responsible for what you view online.
ReplyDelete21 states blocked out of 50 states? Come on... just a little more and it will be blocked in the entire United States.
ReplyDeletePROJECT 2025 DJT
Delete