Trump to issue order blocking states from regulation AI
 |
| President Donald Trump vowed to sign an executive order banning state AI regulation. Credit: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images |
President Donald Trump announced Monday that he plans to sign an executive order permitting only "one rule" for regulating artificial intelligence in the U.S.
"There must be only One Rulebook if we are going to continue to lead in AI. We are beating ALL COUNTRIES at this point in the race, but that won’t last long if we are going to have 50 States, many of them bad actors, involved in RULES and the APPROVAL PROCESS," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.
Several states, including California and New York, have passed statewide legislation this year regulating various aspects of AI, including transparency, whistleblower protections, and user and teen safety. Trump did not elaborate on which states he considered bad actors in the regulatory process, or what qualified them as bad actors.
A version of an executive order that leaked online last week reportedly directed federal agency and cabinet leaders to determine how to punish states with existing AI laws, according to The Verge.
Earlier this year, Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act attempted to ban state regulation of AI for 10 years, a provision that Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green notably rejected. The moratorium was very unpopular amongst registered voters, according to a poll conducted in mid-May. The measure was eventually voted down 99-1 by the Senate. Some MAGA supporters, including Trump ally Steve Bannon, continue to oppose industry-led regulation of AI.
Still, proponents of a regulatory ban still want to provide AI companies carte blanche to innovate without having to address state-by-state regulations. David Sacks, a tech venture capitalist and the Trump administration's special advisor for AI and crypto, is reportedly behind the executive order, according to The Verge.
It's not clear how Trump's executive order would affect Congressional legislation, like the bipartisan bill sponsored by Republican Sen. Josh Hawley and Democrat Sen. Mark Hawley that would require federal agencies and major U.S. companies to account for AI-related workforce reductions.
A report released last week by the tech research nonprofit Future of Life Institute found that only three of eight major AI models got a passing grade on safety.
#ImpeachTrump
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThere goes innovation, thanks to his stable genius.
ReplyDeleteMeans nothing- it’s not law
ReplyDeleteThat is how to make an entrance
ReplyDeleteWell he certainly makes impacts but next one in will reverse them. Let's see if he makes a difference to his economy and helps his poor. I hold my judgements.
DeleteWhen a government demands “one rulebook,” it’s not chasing efficiency — it’s centralizing the throttle. Uniformity sounds pro-innovation until you notice who gets to write the rules and who loses the ability to say no.
ReplyDeleteHe is very pro AI, understands what’s at stake and why the U.S. must become the leader in AI, so this is generally a smart move. Only if Democrats get into power again can this become a problem. Democrats love bureaucratic regulations that suffocate businesses.
ReplyDeleteThat probably triggers the crash...lol
ReplyDeleteWhen your entire economy is hedging one industry, this is to be expected. Unfortunate, but expected.
ReplyDeleteand an economy that eliminates jobs, uses massive amounts of water and electricity and turbocharges disinformation and propaganda to an already undereducated, easily manipulated population.
DeleteThat would be fine if he ran a competent and honest federal government. As it is, AI regs will only reflect the tech bro who has paid the biggest bribe
ReplyDeleteYou mean like when liberals are in charge? Tell me again how the government paying private insurance companies, who pay Democrat Congress members through campaign contributions, billions of dollars is cool. And while we’re at it tell me why the DNC suddenly has to take out $15 million loans because they’re broke…amazingly right when USAID was shut down and those sweet NGO kickback dollars went away.
Deletethey've already paid in 100s of millions in campaign donations, now they're calling in the chips.
Deletei guess all the States Right’s mandates the GOP railed on for decades was BS?
ReplyDeletethose folks gonna just roll
over?
their cowardice has no floor.
There are hundreds of federal laws…are you going to call out every one of them? The federal government has the right and responsibility to regulate certain things, that’s why it’s there. Other things, as many as possible, should be governed by states, that stance has never changed. You’re just desperately looking for an example of hypocrisy when there are 100s of examples of liberal hypocrisy. Nice try though.
DeleteOnly those who bribe Donny can play with AI laws.
ReplyDeleteWaiting for the idiotic preprogrammed bot response "we voted for this"
ReplyDeleteHow much did the Tangerine Toddler get paid for that??
ReplyDeleteStates rights are dead
ReplyDeleteThe sky is falling. So why are states now in control of abortion laws? Why is the department of education being dismantled so states can control their education? Your liberal hysteria makes me laugh.
Deleteif you weren't so stupid, you'd understand... but you're in a cult.
DeleteLet’s examine that theory retard…you must agree 100% with the cult leaders, it is your duty to repeat the cult ideology everywhere, if you disagree with the cult in anyway you are excommunicated and they try to ruin your life. If you don’t agree with a cult member they will literally cut off family and friends of decades, your ideology can only exist in an echo chamber and cannot be exposed to outside influences such as logic and critical thinking or the cult’s talking points would collapse. Yup…that 100% the liberals but nice try
Deleteit meant legalising monopoly the AI business. EVIL Government as usual
ReplyDelete👍👍
ReplyDeleteDangerous!!!!. T is ignorant
ReplyDelete𝗽 𝗲 𝗱 𝗼 𝗽 𝗵 𝗶 𝗹 𝗲
ReplyDeleteA.1. Sauce regulations?
ReplyDeleteBig Tech tried to slip this in the last Senate bill and the house took it out. Now, Trump is attempting to by-pass the States on AI.
ReplyDeleteylu know, gop "states rights'
ReplyDeleteAny state has their own Congress and Senate , they are the ones alloy to legislate anything regarding their states.
ReplyDeleteI create responsible A.I. tech, but we still need vigilance when it comes to bad actors.
ReplyDeletewww.DrHawk.AI
What happened to ... Whatever is not explicitly in the Constitution is the authority of the state.
ReplyDeleteThat ship sailed a long time ago.
DeleteI'm sure AI would fall under interstate commerce but the idea of doing this by EO is ridiculous
DeleteAll of Captain Underpants Executive orders are crazy...
ReplyDeleteState rights!!!!
ReplyDeletehttps://scontent.fpoa5-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/596111633_25152067477791463_8322963373520255595_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_p75x225_tt6&_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=bd9a62&_nc_ohc=OQegQYBom_gQ7kNvwF1jitr&_nc_oc=AdlETxj6ahmkdofyKFbRU6cBkH_yJMm3fvkhT1EoyzOAwNRrhNVVIZNZACzW2d2kxUO4pHlc2eZ9emRQwu0jRHqv&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent.fpoa5-1.fna&_nc_gid=fTrTiyOdXV1bY8vMvj-uXQ&oh=00_AfnOKCwbTKhzSCkteTEf78yA2YvcAeobVK7MkWnvFVr0LQ&oe=69401989
ReplyDeleteThis is alarming. AI regulation isn’t just a policy checkbox, it’s about safety, ethics, and protecting people from runaway technology. Centralizing power under one administration and overriding state-level safeguards isn’t leadership, it’s recklessness. States shouldn’t be stripped of their ability to protect their citizens while experimenting with a tool that can impact everything from jobs to privacy to national security. Be interesting to see who's patting his pockets for this!
ReplyDeleteSo much for the smaller federal government that you voted for
ReplyDeleteAnother executive order? wtf is the use of congress and the senate.
ReplyDeleteThat just means this is all temporary, at least. Trump's utter laziness and unwillingness to learn even the basics about how the government works is probably going to save this country.
DeleteIt will have no effect on state's right--I doubt even the SCOTUS will support this when it gets challenged.
ReplyDeleteAI DYSTOPIA is here right now 👈🗣️
ReplyDeleteGee, what a surprise 😮
ReplyDeleteThis will be the final straw in the collapse of democracy. Frightening
Because he loves sharing the made up scenarios of him, it strokes his ego like his followers do.
ReplyDeleteHere he goes trying to dictate something else using another executive order. He need to be focus on one thing and one thing only and that’s affordability. This top priority in this country
ReplyDeleteIt gets old saying it for every EO but... not a thing. This is not something POTUS can do. Moron.
ReplyDeleteThat's a violation of the 10 th amendment!
ReplyDeleteHe can sign any EO he wants, but that one is not legally binding.
ReplyDeleteOrganic Ignorance regulating Artificial Intelligence. MAGNETS!!
ReplyDeleteHe can’t make laws. Period
ReplyDeleteTrump promises many things not within his authority- this is a classic example. His EOs are not laws binding on anyone other than executive branch personnel- he has zero authority over states.
ReplyDeleteLet the states decide. DJT. Does Nobel award a prize for weasels?
ReplyDeleteSo much for state rights now? 🤣 He wants to control businesses, take away free speech and free press, and now he wants to force states to follow his AI rules. This makes him, a communist.
ReplyDeleteWhat ever happened to the republican party wants LESS government involvement. This party is the exact opposite
ReplyDeletehttps://chat.whatsapp.com/LeE2JGvsQPEJFWTZA9etsF
ReplyDeletehttps://chat.whatsapp.com/LeE2JGvsQPEJFWTZA9etsF
https://scontent.fpoa5-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/597734948_1630414284786690_4664441138951635794_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_p75x225_tt6&_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=bd9a62&_nc_ohc=BKGPy0KQtIcQ7kNvwGt7iv0&_nc_oc=AdkYqeA8BSo4oeRbPVNosjiHUjI216WRvw6wOm5_tF0-hPTcWzyE__jStCx4UyQhUl-vnJSPkz10TElMvP6r9BJf&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent.fpoa5-1.fna&_nc_gid=oIesD3_vXc5CBvot7ZM9MQ&oh=00_AflVabXwTVsCnHUjPuxgTiRQB-WXn6KjEFQYm5MijokwWw&oe=69400F80
Maybe he can sign the release of the complete, unredacted Epstein Files first? Just slide it across the desk and tell him it's a pardon for a drug kingpin who just bought a million dollars of Trump's bitcoin.
ReplyDeleteWhile I trust and admire President Trump, I recognize his presidency will come to an end. I have zero trust in the Federal Government after the horrible Covid vaccine debacle! 🤬
ReplyDeleteWe dont want AI robots digital money or neuralink. All are bad for us
ReplyDeletesays who? The rich man’s media?
DeleteWe can't allow bad actors at the state levels to influence AI to their own liking!!! That's like letting Dr. Fauci control the drugs used for COVID-19!!!! Oh wait he was allowed to do that!!!!
ReplyDeleteNo AI. No thanks.
ReplyDeleteDon't like it on my cell phone.
ReplyDeleteFirst the robots taking jobs , now AI. Who owns them ? Super Rich people...the people who don't give a fig for the working class
ReplyDeleteI am not to sure , that's a good idea !
ReplyDeleteBan AI
ReplyDeleteAgree
ReplyDeleteI do not like AI
ReplyDeleteme either total BS
DeleteI DO NOT LIKE >> AI EITHER > GET RID OF IT !! A " HUUUUUUUUUUUUGE MISTAKE ‼️ 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡👹👹
ReplyDeleteAI uncovers trumps and group of pedophile lies!!
ReplyDeleteyour an f ing wack job
Deleteand your a dinosaur maga baby boomer who will soon be forgotten except that you were a traitor and pedophile supporter!!
Delete