OpenAI Is getting a major interface ChatGP overhaul | Find a Way

OpenAI is bringing a major change to ChatGPT’s interface

Codex will stay separate, but it will share a usage allowance with ChatGPT starting in December.
By on
Credit: Jakub Porzycki/Getty Images
Matthews Martins

Perhaps facing reality head on is the most honest way to try to escape it.

73 Comments

Stay informed!

  1. Thanks, and I hate it.

    I am running the latest version of ChatGPT and it is still considerably more bloated than ChatGPT Classic. It is still an Electron app with all the quirks, such as the app taking an eternity to launch (even on the fastest Macs) and the Settings page replacing the active window.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also hate this. I just want ChatGPT as a chatbot, not as an agent trying to invade my computer and privacy. And Electron apps are an insult to macOS.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Separate apps is about easier workflow instead of popping in between tabs which feels slower

    ReplyDelete
  4. So, copying Claude…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Imitation is the highest form of flattery

      Delete
    2. The lack imagination there is depressing. They just saw Anthropic can make the experience worse and thought yay $$$. Enshitification.

      Delete
  5. Honestly, combining Chat and Work makes a lot of sense. Having everything in one place would make things much easier.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I hope they don't make the interface too complicated. Sometimes simpler is better.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The shared usage limit is the part I'm most concerned about. Plus subscribers should have enough room to use both tools.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Interesting move by OpenAI. I wonder if this will make Codex more popular among regular ChatGPT users

    ReplyDelete
  9. Finally! Switching between different tabs for different tasks can be annoying

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm curious how this will affect people who use ChatGPT for work every single day

    ReplyDelete
  11. The December usage change doesn't sound great, especially for people who rely heavily on Codex

    ReplyDelete
  12. I actually like keeping Codex separate. Not every feature needs to be merged into one interface.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This could make ChatGPT feel more like an all-in-one productivity tool

    ReplyDelete
  14. I just hope existing features don't get harder to find after the update

    ReplyDelete
  15. The Instant chat exception is good news. At least quick questions won't eat into the shared allowance.

    ReplyDelete
  16. OpenAI keeps changing things so quickly. It'll be interesting to see how users react once this rolls out.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I think the biggest question is whether the shared limits will be generous enough for Plus subscribers.

    ReplyDelete
  18. One unified workspace sounds convenient, but I hope performance doesn't suffer.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Not sure how I feel about this yet. I'll wait until the new interface is available before judging it.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This is probably a good move for people who use ChatGPT for both personal and professional tasks

    ReplyDelete
  21. The usage allowance update is something OpenAI needs to explain more clearly. Nobody likes unexpected limits

    ReplyDelete
  22. Makes sense from a product perspective. ChatGPT is becoming much more than just a chatbot.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I wonder if Business users will get a significantly higher shared allowance.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Another big change! I hope they listen to user feedback during the testing phase.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I actually think this is a pretty good idea. Switching between tabs gets annoying sometimes.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Wait, so ChatGPT and Codex will share the same usage limit? That's the part I'm not too happy about.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Not gonna lie, having everything in one place sounds much better

    ReplyDelete
  28. I just hope they don't mess up the interface. The current one is pretty easy to use

    ReplyDelete
  29. Interesting. I didn't even realize they were planning to change this

    ReplyDelete
  30. The shared limits are a bit concerning, especially if you use Codex regularly.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Let's see how it works in practice. Sounds good on paper, but you never know.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Honestly, I'd rather they focus on improving the existing features first.

    ReplyDelete
  33. This might actually save a lot of time. I switch between Chat and Work quite often.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I'm more interested in how the usage limits will work than the interface change

    ReplyDelete
  35. Hopefully Plus users won't feel like they're getting less for their money

    ReplyDelete
  36. I wonder if they'll let users switch back to the old layout if they don't like the new one.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Makes sense. ChatGPT is slowly turning into a proper workspace.

    ReplyDelete
  38. December isn't that far away. Curious to see how people react to this.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I use ChatGPT mostly for simple questions, so I probably won't notice much difference.

    ReplyDelete
  40. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  41. The Instant chat exception is actually a nice touch.

    ReplyDelete
  42. I can see why they're doing this, but sharing usage with Codex might frustrate a lot of developers.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Another interface change lol. Hopefully this one is actually useful.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I like the idea, just not sure about the shared allowance.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Will be interesting to see if this makes ChatGPT easier to use or just adds more clutter.

    ReplyDelete
  46. This actually makes sense tbh.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Hmm, not sure how I feel about this.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Finally! About time lol.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Hope they don't mess it up.

    ReplyDelete
  50. The shared limits are concerning tho.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Sounds like a good move imo.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Let's see how this goes.

    ReplyDelete
  53. I'm actually looking forward to this.

    ReplyDelete
  54. One less tab, can't complain haha.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Not a fan of the usage limit change.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Interesting move by OpenAI.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Hope Plus users get enough usage.

    ReplyDelete
  58. This could be really useful tbh.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Wait, starting in December?

    ReplyDelete
  60. Makes sense, but still...

    ReplyDelete
  61. I kinda like this idea.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Another big change lol.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Curious to see how it works.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Codex sharing limits? That's a bit much.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Hopefully the new layout is cleaner.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Well, let's see what happens.

    ReplyDelete
  67. About time they simplified things.

    ReplyDelete
  68. This might actually be a game changer.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Not sure this was necessary tbh.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Looking forward to trying it out!

    ReplyDelete
Post a Comment
Previous Post Next Post