Why a powerful planet-warming gas is surging in Earth's atmosphere.

Why a powerful planet-warming gas is surging in Earth's atmosphere

Climate 101 is a Mashable series that answers provoking and salient questions about Earth’s warming climate. 

The potent greenhouse gas methane continues to increase in Earth's atmosphere, and it shows no sign of slowing down.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) graph below paints a clear picture. Following a temporary flattening or stabilization of methane levels in the aughts, the odorless, invisible gas has continually risen since around 2008, and more recently has accelerated

Methane is a problematic greenhouse gas because it traps heat on the planet 28 times better than carbon dioxide. (Methane lives in the atmosphere for about a decade before breaking down into the major greenhouse gas carbon dioxide.) Over the last two centuries, as fossil fuel use and cattle ranching expanded around the globe (both make methane emissions), atmospheric methane levels have over doubled, causing a whopping quarter of the human-caused warming on Earth. It's why methane is considered the "second most important greenhouse gas" (behind CO2). 

But explaining the recent, stark methane rise, at a time when climate scientists emphasize greenhouse gas emissions must rapidly fall, isn't simple (sorry!). A number of human-caused and natural factors are at play. Yet scientists are investigating, and closely watching the potential culprits.

"Methane levels are going up but our community does not have a clear answer about why," said Manvendra Dubey, an atmospheric chemist at Los Alamos National Laboratory. "Many natural and anthropogenic [human-caused] sources are contributing." 


Why solving the methane mystery is a challenge

Methane is a tough nut to crack. Comparatively, it's easier to account for the sources of carbon dioxide. That's because when carbon-rich fossil fuels like gasoline, coal, or methane (aka "natural gas") are burned, they create CO2. So knowing how much fuel civilization burns (we do) gives a relatively clear idea of how much CO2 humanity is loading into the atmosphere (a colossal amount).

"CO2 is much more clear-cut from a scientific point of view," explained Steven Smith, an earth scientist at the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.  

In contrast, methane can come from some disparate, indirect, awfully hard-to-monitor sources. "Methane is a much more complicated beast," said Dubey. To track and estimate these emissions, scientists collect emission data from world nations, observe emissions from spacetake readings from aircraft, towers, and cars, and more.

Though the major methane contributors are detailed in the section below, some elusive methane sources include "fugitive gases" (like leaking methane from oil drilling sites) and methane from remote biological sources (like bacteria decomposing plants in wetlands). Atmospheric scientists can actually identify when methane comes from biological sources, as opposed to fossil fuels. But, scientists can't easily distinguish between the types of biological sources (such as methane from wetlands versus methane from cows). This leaves a somewhat murky methane picture, for now. 

What's more, it's possible that natural events in the atmosphere have also impacted methane numbers. Atmospheric scientists sometimes call the atmosphere a great big laboratory teeming with chemical reactions between different gases and particles. And in this atmospheric laboratory, researchers in 2017 found evidence of a decline in a molecule (called OH) that naturally breaks down methane. This would make methane more abundant. But, this effect remains uncertain: Other research has found the declines of OH to be quite small.


What are the sources of methane?

There's a diversity of methane sources. But the factors or processes contributing to the current surge is the big question. "The [methane] budget is complex, so many combinations of processes could be responsible for the increase since 2007," explained Ed Dlugokencky, a research chemist at NOAA's Global Monitoring Laboratory

Here are some major methane sources:


What's not *currently* a major methane source 

The Arctic's permafrost — a layer of soil that stays frozen for years at a time — stores bounties of carbon, in the form of dead plants. There's more than twice as much carbon stored in these frozen soils than in the entire atmosphere. And the Arctic is rapidly heating, meaning some permafrost is thawing. 

But, as of now, researchers haven't found evidence that methane is leaching in significant amounts from the warming Arctic — not yet, anyway. (But this is a worrisome possibility that could unleash a vicious cycle of more warming, known as a "feedback loop," as the release of more greenhouse gases drives more thawing soil.) 

"There's no direct evidence of permafrost contributing to the global methane rise," said Dubey. "I'm not saying it won't happen in the future," he added.

What about that methane "pause"?

Methane levels in the atmosphere stayed relatively steady from around 2000 to 2007. This temporary pause in the methane rise remains an open area of investigation, too.

"That pause is still a real mystery," said Miller.

It's possible the collapse of the Soviet Union in the nineties resulted in a major fall in agricultural emissions, leading to the temporary methane plateau. Some research suggests that nations like the U.S. clamped down on "fugitive emissions," meaning fewer methane releases from the fossil fuel industry at the time. Or the pause could be part of a natural atmospheric cycle, as the atmosphere naturally broke down methane during that period. 

Atmospheric scientists don't have a timetable of when we might expect a more certain picture of why methane started rising, and accelerating, again. Yet the bigger climate picture is already clear: Methane levels are headed in the wrong direction.

The more heat-trapping greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, the more Earth will warm. Already, the warming trend is stark. The last time Earth had a month of normal temperatures — compared to the 20th century — was in February 1985

WATCH: Even the 'optimistic' climate change forecast is catastrophic

Comments

  1. How about telling the full story.....that of methane's two absorption bands, one is a frequency that neither the Sun nor the Earth emits in any significant amount, and the other lies within water vapor's absorption band, so it is already all but completely saturated? Regardless of how much methane increases in the atmosphere, so long as water is in the atmosphere, methane has no effect on global temperature. Learn some science. http://www.ilectureonline.com/.../ASTRONOMY/2/355/6338

    ReplyDelete
  2. and as the north warms more, more methane will be released from the no longer perma permafrost.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Feeding the trees.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, trees don’t use methane. They’ve also developed to deal with certain levels of CO2. The increasing CO2 is a problem for many plants.

      Delete
    2. Dude

      CO2 is good for plants to an extent. Plants can only absorb so much, the excess amounts then fill the atmosphere which in turn causes a blanket effect warming the Earth.

      Delete
    3. Okay use it for carbonated water!

      Delete
    4. Meaningless comment.

      Delete
    5. Kevin Hart Say What GIF -https://media1.tenor.co/images/def752320d7106dcb515c7d44f6d79e4/tenor.gif?itemid=12005301

      Delete
  4. Farting has increased apparently!
    https://gph.is/g/aKdgB8l

    ReplyDelete
  5. Guys. Can we all stop farting? Don’t let Greta start chasin ya’ll

    ReplyDelete
  6. In other words H.A.A.R.P.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bcz she wants be like her sister Venus FireFireFire

    ReplyDelete
  8. It’s surging because Pelosi, Omar and AOC won’t shut up!!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Replies
    1. In every way.There is no science behind it.It's based on nothing but conjecture and
      consensus!Strictly people's opinions
      after they them selves not nature produced the data for their results!!!Consensus has no place in science!!!

      Delete
    2. Dude

      No science behind it?

      https://climate.nasa.gov/

      Delete
    3. You do realize that scientists have a wide range of instruments and methods for measuring total methane in the atmosphere, don’t you? No of course you don’t.

      https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/MethaneMatters

      Delete
    4. Dude - and what is your expertise in this matter? Are you a scientist who has studied the data or just a low information troll?

      Delete
    5. Just need to take a look at how much ice is left on the north pole that's evidence enough, plus the temp of the oceans, and the changing gases in the atmosphere, no evidence at all

      Delete
  10. Taco Bell, that's the problem.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Stay informed!