Waltz and staff reportedly used Gmail for official U.S. government business, raising security issues.

Waltz and staff reportedly used Gmail for official U.S. government business, raising security issues

Anyone else starting to lose count of the security issues?
By  on 
Credit: Mashable composite: Thomas Fuller / SOPA Images / LightRocket via Getty Images; Alex Wroblewski / AFP via Getty Images


Comments

  1. Another security issue?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why are the people allowing this!

    ReplyDelete
  3. no one should be surprised total disaster is occurring with this admin.

    ReplyDelete
  4. and yet youā€™re surprised what else this Clown šŸ¤” brings to the maga Circus šŸŽŖ haus?

    ReplyDelete
  5. They weren't discussing war plans they were discussing committing a terrorist on a Yemen hotel so they could kill on guy they think is a top missile guy what ever the f that's means i hope more leaks happen to show how morally repugnant America is to the rest of the world

    ReplyDelete
  6. Propaganda leftist media sensational story on hearsay evidence.
    NEXT hoax, please.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you seem special. Werenā€™t you and the other morons mewling about Clinton and her emails? This is actually worse. Just because youā€™re too stupid to understand reality, doesnā€™t make this untrue.

      Delete
    2. awe you little pumpkin puppet. What's your flavour of kool aid today ?

      Delete
    3. unAmerican trollsšŸ˜ˆ misinformed and unfortunately lost in the wind, spewing divisive rhetoric are not welcome here.

      Delete
  7. Reportedly? Great hard hitting fake news

    ReplyDelete
  8. Did they use the Clinton server in the closet

    ReplyDelete
  9. šŸŸ šŸ’©šŸ‡·šŸ‡ŗšŸŸ šŸ’©šŸ‡·šŸ‡ŗšŸŸ šŸ’©šŸ‡·šŸ‡ŗšŸŸ šŸ’©šŸ‡·šŸ‡ŗšŸ¤”šŸ¤£
    https://media1.tenor.co/m/IyurSJ_sNagAAAAC/opening-shirt-saturday-night-live.gif?

    ReplyDelete
  10. What a clown šŸ¤”šŸ¤”šŸ¤”šŸ¤”šŸ¤”šŸ¤”

    ReplyDelete
  11. I was born into this world šŸŒŽ without a silver spoon but thanks too Almighty god now I am a billionaire living my best life this made me realize that we need too help those that are in needā€¦.I am giving out $7,000 too the First 10 people too Dm me GOD DIDšŸ˜‡

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anyone who leaked information or used a personal server should be locked up. Plain and simple.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Dude you were a Green Beret, you should know better.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Lock him up. (I mean, isn't that what Trump said to do to Hillary when she used a private server?)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. thatā€™s not reportedly, that was facts

      Delete
    2. military tribunal and firing squad! He called for that before too

      Delete
  15. Will someone please fire this clown?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know. He is a fall guy, and a dumbbell

      Delete
  16. Security only matters if a Democrat is at fault.

    ReplyDelete
  17. No. Most of it is all fear-mongering

    ReplyDelete
  18. #mcdonaldclownsšŸ¤”

    ReplyDelete
  19. what part of REPORTEDLY is confusing

    ReplyDelete
  20. Maybe you want more financial freedom. šŸ‘‡
    https://t.me/CarolAtomTrade

    ReplyDelete
  21. Imagine being a 5 Eyes partner and seeing this in the news.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure they already worked it out digitally.

      Delete
  22. I honestly don't even know what to say anymore.

    "But her emails!"

    I also just re-learned the Colin Powell was the one who recommended Clinton use a private server.

    The people running our country are morons.

    ReplyDelete
  23. At least they were good on OPSEC.

    Edit: It's starting to feel like - watching a car crash in slow motion. But it's a clown car? You know?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "But it's a clown car?"

      Yeah but the clowns are also almost certainly intent on declaring martial law and punishing any and all who dissent while further dismantling the country/constitution/rule of law for the benefit of the billionaires and theocratic fascists while also denying the reality of anthropogenic climate change and leading future generations to a life of horrors owed to their greed.

      Yeah I'd rather be hit by a clown car....

      Delete
    2. With a dildo on it....full Idiocracy.

      Delete
  24. Aiii..a commercial service, where email content is just sitting there on a server, waiting to be bought. At least get your own server - or you know what? People don't even want to hear anymore, it's tough on the body to cringe that tightly.

    ReplyDelete
  25. NOTE: THIS IS NOT TIM WALZ, KAMALA HARRISā€™s VP, THIS IS MIKE WALTZ, TRUMPā€™S NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for clarifying. Have my upvote.

      Delete
  26. Scalps! We want scalps!

    "Publicly, Trump has strongly backed Waltz, but on Wednesday he met with Vice President JD Vance, Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and others to discuss whether to keep him on. A day later, he informed aides he was not firing Waltz, but it was largely out of a desire to avoid giving the ā€œliberal media a scalp,ā€ said a senior administration official."

    On a more serious note, how secure is gmail webmail? You connect the email up to your computer's email program, but you can also get it online? I know it's convenient to get it in multiple virtual places, but that convenience alone seems insecure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Security in this context has nothing to do with your computer connecting to Gmail without interference. It has everything to do with the fact that anyone can have a Gmail account, Gmail's servers are inherently blended environments, and that as an outside entity there are an unknowable number of people with access to Gmail's customer data, how it's used, where it's transferred for backups, etc.

      Delete
    2. Don't forget token duping with nothing more than a link to bypass 2FA.

      Delete
  27. But ..but....Hillary's emails šŸ“§.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Republican voters are a cult of cousins fckin cousins

      Delete
  28. https://archive.ph/Syur7

    ReplyDelete
  29. Theyā€™re always watching to protect our national security /s

    ReplyDelete
  30. Keep up the great security !!!

    ReplyDelete
  31. Seems to always be more room in Clown Car...

    ReplyDelete
  32. I was worried the quiet after the Signal fiasco was a sign of it being swept away... but it looks like there's a whole host of moronic security violations, and perhaps the someone(s) that's investigating has to now go over and find all of them.

    It is utterly hilarious in the most depressing way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But the someone(s) in charge of investigating are the same someone(s) who are committing the moronic security violations.

      Delete
    2. Hey, this is just me guessing as to why we're getting news about further security violations from this guy, as opposed to the whole affair being quietly swept away.

      Delete
  33. http://archive.today/ltBIY

    ReplyDelete
  34. not even a private server. Just public gmail accounts.

    I have read that some of these email addresses had passwords leaked in large notorious email leaks in years prior. I'm not confident these people care about security enough to change their passwords when they are compromised or on a schedule.

    ReplyDelete

  35. From the article:

    NSC spokesman Brian Hughes said he has seen no evidence of Waltz using his personal email as described and said on occasions when ā€œlegacy contactsā€ have emailed him work-related materials, he makes sure to ā€œccā€ his government email to ensure compliance with federal records laws that require officials to archive official correspondence.

    ā€œWaltz didnā€™t and wouldnā€™t send classified information on an open account,ā€ said Hughes.

    Or a fuller quote via Axios:
    https://www.axios.com/2025/04/01/mike-waltz-signal-gmail-security

    "Let me reiterate, NSA Waltz received emails and calendar invites from legacy contacts on his personal email and cc'd government accounts for anything since January 20th to ensure compliance with records retention, and he has never sent classified material over his personal email account or any unsecured platform."

    ReplyDelete
  36. Their nominations should have never been confirmed.

    ReplyDelete
  37. After reading the article this title seems a little misleading

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Am I missing something? The title is 100% accurate.

      Delete
  38. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  39. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Members of President Donald Trumpā€™s National Security Council, including White House national security adviser Michael Waltz, have conducted government business over personal Gmail accounts, according to documents reviewed by The Washington Post and interviews with three U.S. officials.

    The use of Gmail, a far less secure method of communication than the encrypted messaging app Signal, is the latest example of questionable data security practices by top national security officials already under fire for the mistaken inclusion of a journalist in a group chat about high-level planning for military operations in Yemen.

    A senior Waltz aide used the commercial email service for highly technical conversations with colleagues at other government agencies involving sensitive military positions and powerful weapons systems relating to an ongoing conflict, according to emails reviewed by The Post. While the NSC official used his Gmail account, his interagency colleagues used government-issued accounts, headers from the email correspondence show.

    Waltz has had less sensitive, but potentially exploitable information sent to his Gmail, such as his schedule and other work documents, said officials, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe what they viewed as problematic handling of information. The officials said Waltz would sometimes copy and paste from his schedule into Signal to coordinate meetings and discussions.

    ...

    - can someone fire him now?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He's making America great again you ugly terrorist! /s

      Delete
    2. So much winning.

      Delete
    3. There's nothing scarier than a clown...

      Delete
    4. Pennywise has turned in his horror card and fucked off to some other dimension. Not even he wants to terrorize this planet.

      Delete
    5. "can someone fire him now"

      Love when you guys try to cherry pick something to compare to the blatant negligence of the Trump administration to justify trumps actions.

      "Waltz has had less sensitive, but potentially exploitable information sent to his Gmail, such as his schedule and other work documents, said officials, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe what they viewed as problematic handling of information. The officials said Waltz would sometimes copy and paste from his schedule into Signal to coordinate meetings and discussions."

      From your own article

      Delete
  41. Did gmail suck in any reporters or BCC any spies by accident, asking for a moron.

    ReplyDelete
  42. At this point they may as well use Reddit to discuss national security matters. Weā€™ll give them feedback too (i.e., go home!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think they got frustrated with the mods.

      Delete
  43. BUT HER EMAILS!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  44. Just remember all this if thereā€™s ever dem leadership again and they start nattering over shit like this on fox or newsmax that itā€™s all for effect and division

    ReplyDelete
  45. Itā€™s not going to matter.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Finally! A scandal worth of our media. lol

    ReplyDelete
  47. You know... If a foreign entity wanted to mess up the USA.... Now would be the Perfect time to start shit. The people in charge right now are like a slapstick comedy act when it comes to opsec.

    ReplyDelete
  48. I don't see how we're not picking up on the fact that none of them care because they are just there to strip mine to country.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Yeah but thatā€™s a public email server, not an evil private email server.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Of course they do.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Next theyā€™ll be telling us they also use the password: password123

    ReplyDelete
  52. But it was PRELOADED on the COMPUTER you frickinā€™ LIBERAL. Whatā€™s next, he canā€™t use Facebook comment section to discuss ATTACK PLANS?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I canā€™t believe that the WOKE SILICON VALLEY GOOGLE would hack the computers of these AMERICAN PATRIOTS and force them to use Gmail. I hope Trump sends the FTC to break up these evil COMMUNIST SYMPATHIZERS masquerading as American technology companies

      Delete
  53. https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fexternal-preview.redd.it%2FLTtFJXOGFhCAKoMgp6i7TTdbcUlkbJtEOHKbHYvBRk4.gif%3Fauto%3Dwebp%26s%3D389bc9119c959fe6fa44b9a5601a63d459896c81

    ReplyDelete
  54. I wonder if they're not using official channels because they're worried about Elon spying on them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They donā€™t want paper trails for the ongoing coup. If they use internal mail or government systems people can leak stuff. No foia etc.

      They are still on the using the maga cult to threaten judges and media while removing protections to show everyone what they will do. This is the bloodless coup that the heritage foundation talked about. Plan B is not bloodless.

      Both plans have the same rail destination.

      Delete
    2. Naw, if itā€™s about official business, it can be FOIAed even if itā€™s through personal communications. The only thing that matters is if itā€™s personal business or public business, doesnā€™t matter where the business was conducted.

      Granted, itā€™s easier to locate if itā€™s done on government monitored services, so it being on and through private commercial channels may be a way to slow the process, but theyā€™re not untouchable.

      Delete
  55. That's Mike Waltz.
    Trump's national security advisor.
    Using Gmail.
    For fuck's sake.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Replies
    1. Yup, those, the other two guys, SeTh RiCh, and of course the republicansā€™ favourite, Benjamin Ghazi! Wasnā€™t she just full of men???

      Delete
    2. Suddenly the party lambasting Hillary about that dude Ben Ghazi and the other buttery males say this stuff is okay since itā€™s Republicans doing it. Double standard, hypocritical criminals.

      Delete
  57. Hoo boy! If I know anything about the Republican Party and their voters, it's that this is unforgiveable sin #1!!! They are going to be sooooooo... unmoved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The fact is that Republicans never actually cared about Clinton's emails. It was completely just an attack line, but with the help of a coordinated press release by James Comey right before the 2016 election it was somehow very effective.

      Delete
  58. OMG these people are the very definition of incompetent.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Because of course they did. Everyone needs to be fired including the dumbass president.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He's the one who hired them ... And he only hires the very best ...

      Delete
  60. I demand that Waltz get the Hillary treatment from Congress.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unfortunately he'll probably get the Ivanka

      "I didn't realize using a personal address would be an issue, even though my father just spent the last 6 months calling Hillary a national security threat for using a personal account!"

      pass

      Delete
  61. I keep reading Waltz and thinking Walz for some goddamn reason.

    ReplyDelete
  62. The SAME DAMNED PEOPLE who spent a DECADE screaming ā€œBUT HER EMAILZā€ because they were utterly outraged about HRC avoiding the Official Records Act are now doing everything possible to avoid a FOIA request.

    ReplyDelete
  63. ā€œBut her emailsā€¦ā€

    ReplyDelete
  64. G fucking mail.

    GMAIL!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  65. The incompetence just keeps getting worse

    ReplyDelete
  66. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You beat me to it

      Delete
    2. Here, I'll delete it and you can have at it. šŸ‘Š

      Delete
    3. Well what was it? Now I'm curious! šŸ˜“

      Delete
    4. I said, "But Hillary!"

      Delete
    5. Thank you šŸ˜ŒšŸ‘Œ

      Delete
    6. Itā€™s too late

      Delete
  67. the males are quiet buttery these days

    ReplyDelete
  68. Remember when this kind of news used to make the press go wild when it was attached to a vagina?

    ReplyDelete
  69. Wow, democrats didnā€™t learn their lesson from Hilary /s

    ReplyDelete
  70. Bigger than Watergate! Lock him up!

    ReplyDelete
  71. Pretty sure they are trying to communicate outside the existing infrastructure deliberately guys.

    ReplyDelete
  72. He will be the scapegoat even though it is clearly a systematic problem

    ReplyDelete
  73. Fuck these incompetent bastards.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Heā€™s a National SECURITY Advisor!

    Fire his ass, right now.

    ReplyDelete
  75. And the national security council uses signal. What's their point?

    ReplyDelete
  76. Thank God it wasn't a private email server.

    /s

    ReplyDelete
  77. Is ok because he isnā€™t a woman or because he isnā€™t a democrat.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Using Signal and Gmail is stupid yes, but they did not do it because THEY are stupid... They do it to circumvent the Archiving and record keeping part of Goverment if they use correct channels...

    Strange that not a lot more is mentioned about this? They got caught for one thing but how many MORE issues being discussed, not necessarily Goverment secrets, that can impact American citizens lives?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excellent point. Never considered that...

      Delete
  79. But Hillary's e-mail server???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hunter's laptop would like a word also. It must be his fault.

      Delete
    2. Actually it's San Andreas fault.

      Delete
    3. The fault is in their stars.

      Delete
  80. So, after sending these secret messages, their YouTube feed contained ads for fighter jets?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The amount of Grinder ads must have been overwhelming

      Delete
    2. ads for hot sofas near Vance

      Delete
    3. Yup! And cybersecurity ā€œsolutionsā€

      Delete
  81. The guys who discussed highly confidential war plans over group texts use Gmail for government communications?

    Who could have seen that coming.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Further proof anything they say is bad faith garbage. Not that we need moreā€¦

    ReplyDelete
  83. Had to check it wasnā€™t April Fools - that fucking stupid

    ReplyDelete
  84. Please. Stop this. Donā€™t question your elected or confirmed or essential (Musk) government leaders. They stand on the edge of the cliff, wisely using every tool at their disposal, to bravely save America from any and all threats, foreign and domestic.
    God bless them for their amazing intellect and critical thinking to leave the confines of government boundaries to ensure they can do their work effectively. They are our leaders, standing with and supporting Godā€™s saviour for our nation. Superman. Better known as our personal Jesus, Donald J Rump.
    Anyone that doubts my sincerity has read long enough to reach the /s

    God save us from these incredible morons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you had me until ā€œDonā€™t questionā€

      Delete
  85. Real secure, guys. Y'all are the best players on Putin's and Xi's teams. Fucking assholes.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Won't stop them from calling Hillary and Hunter to testify in front of Congress. Because it's all cosplay for the rubes.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Well, it ain't rocket science, right? Lol

    ReplyDelete
  88. Let the whataboutisms begin

    ReplyDelete
  89. This is what we get in the era of DUI hires.

    ReplyDelete

  90. Thereā€™s actually something very interesting hiding in this article.

    This is a Bezos owned publication and it has a certain agenda. But more importantly this is a well sourced (all be it anonymously for the most part) story and was clearly, without a shadow of a doubt leaked.

    So who leaked it? And why?

    I donā€™t claim to know but those are the questions we need answered.

    My guess (and itā€™s just a guess) is that thereā€™s someone (or a group) in the Pentagon pushing thisā€¦possibly even added ā€œJGā€ to the chat. Their aim simply to show the idiocy at play and how reckless the Trump regime is.

    But keep you eyes open for more similar stories from the same anonymous sources.

    ReplyDelete
  91. Hey Jeff bezos suck a dick

    ReplyDelete
  92. Keeping America safe

    ReplyDelete
  93. Yeh but what about them EMAILS right guys?

    ReplyDelete
  94. Absolutely impaired logic. This guy is drunk on power.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your last sentence is two words too long.

      Delete
  95. Can we just say ā€˜lock them upā€™ now.

    ReplyDelete
  96. Soooo many jobs would fire you for this. Maybe most?

    Source: work in IT

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dude right?! 100% fired on the spot and prosecuted under federal infosec laws.

      Source: also work in IT. Im in the financial/banking sector with all of the fun laws and regulations we have to be compliant with.

      Delete
    2. I haven't seen Hegseth fired yet. Walz was not a federal politician, either.

      But, but, what about her emails as the republicans send war plans in a text.

      Delete
    3. *Waltz

      Neither of them are covered under the 'official acts' immunity ruling either.. its ridiculous no one has been fired, arrested, nothing..

      Am seeing new reports these clowns may have been using Gmail for shit too! Sigh..

      Delete
  97. Members of President Donald Trumpā€™s National Security Council, including White House national security adviser Michael Waltz, have conducted government business over personal Gmail accounts, according to documents reviewed by The Washington Post and interviews with three U.S. officials.

    The use of Gmail, a far less secure method of communication than the encrypted messaging app Signal, is the latest example of questionable data security practices by top national security officials already under fire for the mistaken inclusion of a journalist in a group chat about high-level planning for military operations in Yemen.

    A senior Waltz aide used the commercial email service for highly technical conversations with colleagues at other government agencies involving sensitive military positions and powerful weapons systems relating to an ongoing conflict, according to emails reviewed by The Post. While the NSC official used his Gmail account, his interagency colleagues used government-issued accounts, headers from the email correspondence show.

    Read more here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/04/01/waltz-national-security-council-signal-gmail/?utm_campaign=wp_main&utm_medium=social&utm_source=reddit.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Archived version

      https://web.archive.org/web/20250401193116/https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/04/01/waltz-national-security-council-signal-gmail/

      Delete
    2. "A senior Waltz aide used the commercial email service for highly technical conversations with colleagues at other government agencies"

      Is that aide a member of the Signal chat group?
      ā€¢ Signal group member Alex Wong is Waltzā€™s aide, who is serving as the principal deputy national security adviser.
      ā€¢ Signal group member Walker Barrett is likely a senior staffer on Waltzā€™s national security team.

      Delete
    3. Gift link or donā€™t post.

      Delete
    4. NSC confirms Mike Waltz and staff used Gmail for government communication Fox news
      https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nsc-confirms-mike-waltz-staff-used-gmail-government-communication

      Delete
  98. What's next? Using the comments section on YouTube?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Plans for the reconstruction of Gaza drawn in sharpie on a strippers' ass.

      Delete
    2. War Thunder forums.

      Delete
    3. There's precedence for this one

      Delete

  99. this is moving the goalpost of the fiasco, saying that waltz using gmail is worse than the encrypted signal app ignoring the fact that gmail retains records and doesn't let you set them to automatically get nuked, forever, within 4 weeks - like the trump officials did in signal.

    In fact I'm pretty sure even if you deleted your emails google could recover them to an extent, unlike an app that let's you automagically delete them to hide them even if you for whatever reason have uninstalled the app from your phone so people don't know you're trying to hide shit or something

    Again, the real problem with signal was that trump and co was using it's encryption and automagic deletion features to hide records from FIOA requests, records and communications that are required to be preserved so the people have a clear fucking clue as to what their administration is doing

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Psst they are not talking about Tim Walz they are talking about Michael Waltz. This is the right fucking up again.

      Delete

    2. The thing is that the same Trump officials inviting journalists to Signal group chats are also using Gmail for government communications

      Gmail retains records but isnt encrypted, itā€™s basically the inverse of the issue with Signal

      Itā€™s not really moving the goalposts, itā€™s saying ā€œthe people who committed X fuckup have also been committing Y fuckupā€, it makes it worse lol

      Delete
    3. The problems, plural, of using Signal also include someone gaining access to the phone because it's not in a secure location (say it's in, I dunno, Russia) and getting random reporters numbers sucked into your group chat.

      Delete
  100. The incompetence is reaching new levels never seen before

    ReplyDelete
  101. Not that anyone would OK this but at what point do we sound the alarm and launch an administration-wide, full-scale investigation into their communications for the sake of national security and find out how much of our government communications are compromised????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Conducted by whom? The Trump admin already investigated themselves over the Signal fiasco and found nothing wrong. The House and Senate GOP won't authorize any investigations either.

      Delete
    2. The responsibility is falling more and more to the people. We need to take to the streets and visibly oppose the corruption. More now than ever in decades or even longer

      Delete
  102. It is amazing that these people survived high school.

    ReplyDelete
  103. Do these people not know Trumps #1 rule that he was vocal about, daily, when running for president against Hillary Clinton. Oh my god, shit will hit the ceiling when Trump hears about this. Lock him up, lock him up, lock him up.

    ReplyDelete
  104. These are not serious people.

    ReplyDelete
  105. Probably spied on people they perceived as a threat to their scamming the world...the US is just their wading pool...lol...

    ReplyDelete
  106. That's a paddlin'.

    ReplyDelete
  107. It seems, as if it is an April fools' day joke!

    PS: I am sure that this article isn't a joke.

    ReplyDelete
  108. Sure does seem like people in DC don't want their communications to be subject to Freedom of Information Act requests doesn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  109. Waltz is going to be the fall guy for all of the mistakes this administration has made. His days are numbered.

    ReplyDelete
  110. Account probably addressed through some server at a Trump SuperPac. Further evidence itā€™s used to avoid FOIA.

    ReplyDelete
  111. Come on, Pam Bondi! Strike! Where's that inner opportunist yearning to climb over the fragile bodies of your colleagues? Do it! Strike! Use The Bitch, Pam! Use the Bitch, and strike him down!

    Kash? Bro, forget what I said about Pam. It was you all along, baby. CLIMB OVER THE MOUNTAIN OF CORPSES THAT IS THEIR CAREERS AND FOREVER CEMENT YOUR NAME IN AMERICAN whatever. Come on! Pam is weak! Mike is weak! They are vulnerable! Strike! Use the Ratfuck, Kash! USE IT! GET THAT BOOK DEAL!

    ReplyDelete
  112. Doesnā€™t Gmail routinely mine emails for information and sell it? They donā€™t call it that, but itā€™s as secure as writing messages backwards on office windows with grease pencils.

    ReplyDelete
  113. Lock'em up, I guess?

    ReplyDelete
  114. L'il Timmy just messaged me, looking for my input on another raid!! Hold my beer....

    ReplyDelete
  115. But her emails.........4 years of congressional investigations by Republicans.
    https://giphy.com/gifs/mashable-xTiTndCIut7o7OpEL6

    ReplyDelete
  116. Of course they did. They're retards.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Stay informed!