'Thor: Love and Thunder' review: How Taika Waititi ruined the fun himbo Avenger | Mashable.

'Thor: Love and Thunder' review: How Taika Waititi ruined the fun himbo Avenger

Chris Hemsworth is back, but that's where the good news ends.

How'd they make this himbo boring? Credit: Jasin Boland./Marvel Studios

With a rock n' roll soundtrack and a bevy of beloved stars, Thor: Love and Thunder seemed poised to be a victory lap for Taika Waititi. After helmer Alan Taylor's Thor: The Dark World went over like a wet fart in 2013, this charismatic writer/director/actor not only rebranded the titular God of Thunder into an adorkable himbo for Thor: Ragnarok but also cast himself as the lovable rock creature Korg. Waititi also introduced thirst trapping to the MCU by way of a strapped Valkyrie, a naked Hulk, and a long-established sex symbol, Jeff Goldblum. Fans would likely have been giddy for more of the same in Waititi's follow-up. But while a bunch of the characters we've loved return for this fourth installment, the thrill is gone. Thor: Love and Thunder is a mess that can't make sense of what matters. 

Co-written by Taika Waititi and Jennifer Kaytin Robinson, Thor: Love and Thunder picks up with its eponymous Avenger galavanting around space with the Guardians of the Galaxy, flexing his beefy biceps for good and running from the pain of his long-ago break-up with mortal scientist Dr. Jane Foster (Natalie Portman). That is, until Gorr the God Butcher (Christian Bale in Voldemort mode) descends on New Asgard with shadow beasts in tow, kidnapping a handful of Asgardian kiddies along the way to kick off his war against the gods.

It's tough enough to run into an ex, but Thor is a bit crushed to realize that Jane has gotten a post-split glow-up courtesy of Mjölnir magic. Blonde, buff, and clad in Viking armor, Jane is now known as Mighty Thor, and she can kick all kinds of monster butt. But to bring an end to Gorr's vengeance-fueled annihilation of all gods, these exes will have to team up — and bring along some previously established friends, like Korg (Waititi) and King Valkyrie (Tessa Thompson). 

Unfortunately, amid requisite action sequences, introducing new MCU entities, and plentiful flashbacks that doggedly detail the chilly breakdown of Thor and Jane's once-piping hot romance, Thor: Love and Thunder doesn't have much time for fan-favorite figures. Both Korg and Valkyrie are awkwardly sidelined to make room for Jane, Thor, and Gorr, but even those main storylines feel short-changed.                                                 

Thor and Jane's odd couple dynamic doesn't work here. 


Credit: Jasin Boland/marvel Studios

In Thor, the arrogant jock god and the brainy but beautiful scientist shared an intoxicating chemistry. Here, that sexual spark is dulled, even though — as trailers teased — Hemsworth gets naked and Jane has a sexy new look. Somehow their scenes together lack heat and feel more like tweens fumbling at flirting, instead of international sex symbols/immortal gods rediscovering their spark. 

Perhaps the problem is that Jane and Thor are set up for wildly different tones in the film. Thor is bounding from one adventure to another with Golden Retriever energy, bringing with him a goofy charm that would be at home in any of Waititi's other projects. Meanwhile, Jane is enduring an arc all about mortality and disease plucked straight from the comic books. Jane's somber storyline repeatedly colliding with Thor's whole deal is jarring throughout, never allowing for the audience to slide into this rocky ride. But this is just one element of the film's awkwardness. 

Gorr, a MCU villain not given his due. 

Credit: Marvel Studios

Thor gave fans the first MCU villain we couldn't help but root for with Loki, but while Gorr isn't nearly as dashing, he does have a somewhat reasonable gripe — although like Black Panther's Killmonger, Gorr's response is rather overzealous. You see, Thor: Love and Thunder doesn't open with fun Thor shenanigans. It opens with an emaciated Gorr, desperately carrying his dying daughter through a sun-scorched desert. Only after she has died in his arms does he find salvation in a fertile oasis, where the god Gorr worshipped sits laughing at his suffering. So, Gorr kills his god. And then sets out to kill more. 

We're meant to assume this is all bad news, because of a flurry of indistinct distress calls. But what makes Gorr's quest different from those of the Avengers or the Guardians or the Eternals when they brought down Loki, Hela, Ego, or Arishem? Even in Thor: Love and Thunder there are gods on display who are either cartoonishly villainous or cavalierly callous. Yet there's no room to explore the potential moral grey area of Gorr's mission. It's chalked up simply to cursed revenge brought on by heartbreak. Still, even within such limits, Bale delivers a hell of a performance. 

While others caper or smolder for the camera, Bale seeps with agony and a twisted delight in bringing down the gods who would make us humans playthings. There's an exciting menace in his thin smile. But best of all is when he turns into a kids' show host from hell, decapitating a snake creature to use it as a puppet to terrorize the children he's abducted. In a dank cage on the dark side of the universe, Bale brings color and a twisted hint of a loving dad whose soul has been mutilated by grief. Waititi gives us something to sink our teeth into here, but Bale's screentime is all too brief. 

There must be room, after all, to watch the dull flashbacks of Jane and Thor's tepid isolation of affections. Forget Marriage Story-level drama. Their long, mysterious breakup has all the emotional weight of a soggy napkin.                                                          

Thor: Love and Thunder does have some bright spots, like Russell Crowe. 


Credit: Jasin Boland./Marvel Studios

Barrel-chested, bearded, and barking about orgies, Crowe is delicious fun as Zeus. With a thick Greek accent, Crowe had me the moment he called Thor "Babycakes." Whether it's Virtuosity or Winter's Tale, Crowe doesn't shy away from playing an over-the-top villain. Here, he is a welcome reminder of what fun a Thor movie can be, outshining even Hemsworth in bravado. Sadly, Crowe is not given a ton to do in his first MCU outing.  

Other brief but delightful elements include the clever recapping device of bringing back the Asgardian theater troupe (Matt Damon, Luke Hemsworth, and Sam Neill), a soundtrack banging with Guns N' Roses, and a Jean-Claude Van Damme-style split with a God of Thunder extravagance. Thompson is underused, but she smirks and sizzles in a handful of scenes. There's also a barrage of dazzling gods on display during the Zeus sequence. While they are captivating in their details, designs, and cultural inclusivity, the blink-and-you'll-miss-them nature of this sequence speaks to the slapdash approach that makes the film deeply frustrating, as it is littered with wasted opportunities. 

Waititi throws so much into Thor: Love and Thunder that we're meant to be awed by the wild (CGI) stunts, gorgeous stars, the superhero spectacle, the out-of-left-field wackiness of screaming goats and a jealous warhammer. But these flashy elements aren't woven together as much as tossed together. The storytelling is lazy and bumbling, which makes the emotional beats feel clumsy. The characters are abandoned. The climax offers a frenzy of ideas but little thought, leading to a groan-worthy epilogue that pulls our himbo hero into a new chapter that is the stuff of cheesy '80s sitcoms, not cinema. 

With Thor: Ragnarok, Waititi gifted us a humorous hunk who set out hearts (and loins) aflame. With Thor: Love and Thunder, he seemed to promise more of the same, but squelches an epic romance, floods the film with maudlin moments that feel rushed and unresolved, and never really delivers a memorable punchline. In the end, Love and Thunder is raucous, flashy, and vacuous, not satisfyingly fun. 

Thor: Love and Thunder is now in theaters.

More in FilmMarvel

Comments

  1. It was a great film! Don’t believe the kill joys

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. they said the same thing about Multiverse of Madness and it was actually pretty good.

      Delete
    2. maybe for wider audiences yes. But this was one of my favourite storylines in the comics and it got butchered 🤷‍♂️

      Delete
    3. it was just good.. not great.. lol

      Because it has alot of continuity issues and Thors arcs simply went backwards and made him dummer...

      Example, in Thor 2 he walked away from the camp before summoning the Bifrost, because he knew the Bifrost would damage the camp..
      In Love and Thunder he summons the Bifrost in the middle of Townhall and leaves a huge gaping hole in the roof like a dummy.. simply for cheap laughs....

      Thats not the sign of a great film.. 😉

      Delete
  2. Thought "Love and Thunder" was one thing ... pulled the ol' switch-a-roo to something nobody even thought that they would switch it with. Movie was good but they pushed the comedy a little too hard. Christian Bale was pretty good.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Aren't movies made to entertain the masses! In fact, there are millions of movie titles to fit the masses. Movies aren't a one size fits all thus the meaning Genre. Regardless, it's truly the indicator the masses have gone mad in these trying times. It's either conform to my views or be gone, wait, isn't there an Avenger movie themed via this thought 🤔
    It's a movie made for entertaining not made to bash people that like it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. making an Entertaining movie does not mean u ignore quality control.. and Love & Thunder had lots of issues, from tone to continuity errors...

      Delete
    2. I'm no movie critic myself... it's either I like it or I don't. I'll give it an A B or C rating. The rest isn't important to lose sleep or be angry or even frustrated at others about. Just my opinion.

      Delete
  4. Well at least it introduced Gen Z (or whatever they call this generation) to Dio, GnR songs. Adding the uncensored version of 'Rocket Queen' to the soundtrack would've been nice - just so we see the reaction of this snowflake generation 😂

    ReplyDelete
  5. Saw it at the London IMAX yeterday, thought it was great.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Do you even watch the movie, probably not.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Saw it yesterday and kind of agree. Not the best by far.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Let me guess, they dumbed him down so as to make the women the actual heroes of the movie.

    I loved Lady Thor in the comics, and one reason was that she didn’t exist to make Thor look stupid or weak. She existed and had her own merits and struggles. She was a great character.

    But I guess I should go see it and see for myself.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I thought it was a funny comedic superhero movie to break up all the seriousness from the last few movies. Plus it adds to those character. So relax mashable

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it was too comedic.. dialed at 11... it felt more a Parody of Thor, then an actual continuation of his story...

      Delete
    2. You know Ragnarok is of the same vibe and is widely considered one of the greatest MCU movies yet the more “serious” Thor movies are considered some of the worst, so seems you’re in the minority.

      Delete
  10. Mashable is back and that's where the good reporting ends

    ReplyDelete
  11. They will have to bring Thor back as king of Asgard to regenerate the movie and make it great again

    ReplyDelete
  12. All I'm saying is goats... loved it 😀

    ReplyDelete
  13. Movie was awesome ! Mashable’s fake captions to get attention:// not so much

    ReplyDelete
  14. This looked more a higher emphasis on special effects.

    But the puns were kinda the same line of humor.

    I watched it 3D i was still impressed. Could have been cleaner..

    the cinemaxx version had too many fast paced cuts.

    The romantic aspect was a bit dull.

    "Janes" acting was week this part. bad chemistry for some reason with thor.

    "Thor" had a solid performance.

    Definitely weaker compared to its predecessors.

    Avatar 2 will definitely dust the floor of all 3D movies.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This Movie just ruined the Thor series for me. Just not a good flick.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. this one ruined it for you? Dark world was terrible

      Delete
    2. of course !the new thor movie was full of cringey jokes ....i almost fell asleep halfway watching it .

      Delete
    3. the title was a clear indicator.

      Delete
    4. it’s true. The whole Marvel portfolio has went to crap in my opinion.

      Delete
  16. Personally I loved it when I saw it last night!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hopefully this movie will bomb at the boxoffice to send the business a clear signal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why do you want it to bomb? What do you think this will achieve - what message are you wanting to send? Comments like this mean nothing without context.

      I enjoyed it. It was fun, there was a heart to the story, and the actors clearly took matters seriously enough that they weren't coasting through things. This is my kind of film. It may not be your kind of film but guess what? You don't have to watch it. No one is forcing you to, in exactly the same way no one is forcing me to watch the latest film from Jordan Peele, the latest in the Jurassic Park franchise (the original being one of two films I have walked out on), or Elvis. But I don't want any of those films to bomb because I know a huge number of people enjoy them.

      Why be so negative?

      Delete
    2. what’s the message?

      Delete
    3. I think it's pretty obvious, what he means is, the important punching film had a girl in it.

      Delete
  18. https://giphy.com/gifs/anchorman-lies-lie-EouEzI5bBR8uk

    ReplyDelete
  19. Mashable is back, and that’s where it ends

    ReplyDelete
  20. Thor Ragnarok was atrocious, awful Pandering Garbage of the worst kind, no surprise that this movie is awful as well, this is what happens when you hand these gigs to no talent hacks like Taika Waititi and Jennifer Kaytin Robinson because of who they are as opposed to what they create. Affirmative action works most everywhere except the arts. Handing someone a career in film and TV based on their ethnic origin race or gender is always a mistake, and the final product always proves that it was a mistake because it’s always garbage.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Replies
    1. Still seeing #ThorLoveAndThunder tonight tho lol

      Delete
  22. I'm sorry but ever since Disney got there hands on marvel, It's starting to go downhill. Thor was still entertaining, The actors really poured their heart and soul into it but in the end it just felt like a whole bunch of cheesy gags crunched down into a film. Ragnarok was much better it had some cheesiness but it didnt feel forced like love & Thunder and didnt feel so full of cheesiness that it was exploding out the sides.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. if you really think about it. Marvel movies are a rehashed formula from 90’s Disney cartoons. Corny jokes. Comic relief sidekick. All we need is an Elton John song and it’s come full circle.

      Delete
    2. I agree… and it was so heavy!!

      Delete
    3. this was LITERALLY the same style as Ragnarok, but with a better villain

      Delete
  23. It was funny and entertaining, but the script could have been miles better

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. same for the MCU entry that came before it

      Delete
  24. It was so funny and entertaining! My whole family loved it!

    ReplyDelete
  25. It was decent, but felt pretty rushed. It was hard to feel much emotion from the scenes cause they were either too brief for you to care much about what was happening or the silliness was draining too much of the seriousness out of certain situations.

    ReplyDelete
  26. The worst Marvel movie ever, Black Widow was tolerable compared to this. They ruined the GORR character and made a joke out of Thor

    ReplyDelete
  27. I agree to disagree. I loved it as much for some sappiness as the rest of the packae.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Hahah this is the worst take ever

    ReplyDelete
  29. This review is over the top and I actually thought Russell Crowe was the worst part of the movie. My family enjoyed it.

    ReplyDelete
  30. It was a disappointment was so looking forward to it

    ReplyDelete
  31. A fun comic book movie??? I am shocked!!!

    https://media1.tenor.co/images/c6db6eb9341bfbc2f064fefd4c36cb4c/tenor.gif?c=VjFfZmFjZWJvb2tfd2ViY29tbWVudHM&itemid=25532804

    ReplyDelete
  32. The goats made it for me.

    ReplyDelete
  33. It was okay…but would’ve wished for some hard rock/hair metal songs other than GnR. Fonts during the mid credits were in the style of other bands like Poison or Aerosmith.

    I also felt it was the worst use of November Rain…I don’t want to see any comedic elements during that riff.

    They should’ve just hired Slash to write original music.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Worst review ever. It’s a fricking rom com end of discussion 😂

    ReplyDelete
  35. What’s wrong with everyone? The film was great!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. naah.. it was good.. Not great.. it had alot of continuity issues, tone was everywhere and the Jokes were dailed at 11 and was to much at some points, making the movie feel more a parody of Thor, instead a continuation if his arc...
      Even his Story Arc and growth went backwards...

      Delete
  36. this movie is for Mr. Bean fans

    ReplyDelete
  37. Still going to see it. I hope it’s not a total comedy. For me, there needs to be a good balance of humour, grittiness and edge. Too much humour and it becomes a spoof and doesn’t honour the characters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you concerns are exactly how I'd describe the film. There's some really fantastic grittiness in there and some humor is needed to balance it out but in that sense the pacing was way off. The humor gets piled on too excessively for scenes that seem to never end. So much so that the darkness became a relief from the comedy that never really seems to land as often as they clearly hoped it would.

      Delete
    2. thanks for sharing

      Delete
  38. I thoroughly enjoyed this film. Was as good a Ranarok? No. But was it a good film, absolutely. Don’t believe the negative reviews

    ReplyDelete
  39. Waititi made a shrill, overly comedic, annoying movie? No way!

    ReplyDelete
  40. Can’t wait, going to see it on Monday!!

    ReplyDelete
  41. These people literally have nothing better to do. Get out and take a walk and perhaps talk to people. The movie wasn’t bad at all.

    https://media1.tenor.co/images/c937403f0daf3137030718d4377854d1/tenor.gif?c=VjFfZmFjZWJvb2tfd2ViY29tbWVudHM&itemid=14431055

    ReplyDelete
  42. This about sums it up for me..disappointed🥲

    ReplyDelete
  43. That sounds like a watiti movie

    ReplyDelete
  44. Not all movies can be Endgame, nor are they trying to be, so we should maybe stop trying to measure them with the same stick.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Went and watched it last night to much of a comedy then a Thor movie

    ReplyDelete
  46. Thor and Thunder

    ReplyDelete
  47. It was a hot mess. They turned an otherwise powerful superhero into a Bumbling idiot. It had a frenetic jumbled pace and they completely underutilized Jane Foster. The best part were the screeching goats. Maybe that should give them the sequel. 

    ReplyDelete
  48. I loved it.. Superhero movies are not made to increase you intellectual capabilities. It is supposed to entertain you so you can have a good time with your friends and family...

    ReplyDelete
  49. Enjoyed it, the family all did

    ReplyDelete
  50. Yep.. it was pretty average..sadly...
    A real shame😔

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. oh no!! I have been waiting for a full review from you

      Delete
    2. Haha sorry cuz.. I think watching films every...single...day has lead me to start critiquing everything in cinema... I just need to enjoy it for what it is 😅
      Sad times...

      Delete
    3. It’s hard - ragnarok was so fresh and new and great - it’s hard to replicate something like that! I won’t hold my breath for this one to be as good then

      Delete
    4. 💯👌

      Delete
  51. Yuck - how can 'Russell Crowe' be a 'bright spot' He is dreadful - Australia claims him as their own and they are welcome to him. (woe betide them if they try to steal Taika Waititi..)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Crowe is cringe, but I think he suited an equally unlikeable character. I thought he was a New Zealander

      Delete
  52. Save your money. This movie is ridiculous. Dialogue and comedy were soooo boring.

    ReplyDelete
  53. I really enjoyed it

    ReplyDelete
  54. It was goofy but good, really enjoyed it

    ReplyDelete
  55. That movie was awesome.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Replies
    1. I didn’t watch it Lol I’m not a fan of the portrayal of Thor in the movies. It’s too much of a sitcom.

      Delete
  57. Classic Taika waititi

    ReplyDelete
  58. Waititi is a fckn muppet! I wouldn't let him touch and butcher any further franchise and for heaven's sake ban him from Star Wars

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Stay informed!