Japan's ispace likely failed its moon landing attempt | Mashable.

Private company's daring moon landing likely just failed

A reminder that getting to the moon is still really, really hard.

People within the ispace mission control center anxiously await some confirmation that the Hakuto-R mission landed successfully on April 25, 2023. Credit: ispace / YouTube screenshot

A Japanese company likely crashed a spacecraft into the moon as it attempted a soft landing Tuesday, causing an abrupt end to its five-month journey from launch pad to the lunar surface.

The company, ispace, invited the world to watch alongside its Tokyo-based mission control through a livestream of the event on April 25. The nail-biting landing sequence lasted about an hour as the robotic spacecraft performed a braking engine burn and followed automated commands to adjust the Hakuto-R lander's orientation and speed to touch down.

As the spacecraft descended, mission control had communication with it. But after the maneuvers were completed, the team lost contact with the lander. With a room full of visibly disappointed engineers, ispace officials said they had to assume the landing was unsuccessful. But they'll continue to investigate the status of the lander, said Takeshi Hakamada, CEO of ispace.

"At this moment, what I can tell is we are very proud of the fact that we have already achieved many things during this Mission 1," he said. "We acquired actual flight data during the landing phase. That is a great achievement for the future missions."

Though 60 years have passed since the first uncrewed moon landings, it remains a daunting task, with less than half of missions succeeding. Unlike on Earth, the moon's atmosphere is very thin, providing virtually no drag to slow a spacecraft down as it approaches the ground. Moreover, there is no GPS system on the moon to help guide a craft to its landing spot. Engineers have to compensate for these shortcomings from 239,000 miles away.

"We cannot emulate all the environment of the moon on the Earth before the mission," Hakamada told Mashable in an interview hours after the event, still without an update on the lander's status. "So we have to rely on all the simulations and then a lot of assumptions."

Takeshi Hakamada addressing the crowd after moon landing attempt
The company will continue to investigate the situation to determine what might have gone wrong, said Takeshi Hakamada, CEO of ispace. Credit: ispace / YouTube screenshot

Want more science and tech news delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for Mashable's Top Stories newsletter today.

This is not the first time the private sector has attempted to get to the moon. For example, in 2019 an Israeli nonprofit and company collaborated on the $100 million Beresheet mission, which crashed on the lunar surface after an orientation component failed. The mishap potentially scattered some intriguing artifacts on the lunar surface in the process.

For one of ispace's payload customers, a failed landing would mean the indefinite postponement of another dream: the first Arab moon mission. The ispace lander was supposed to deliver the United Arab Emirates' Rashid rover(opens in a new tab) to the moon, which would explore the Atlas Crater. Along with the Emirati rover, a Japanese space program robot was on board.

Hakuto-R is the first of many other commercial missions that are expected to attempt this feat soon, many of which are an outgrowth of NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services Program(opens in a new tab). The program was established in 2018 to recruit the private sector to help deliver cargo to the moon. Ispace couldn't directly participate in the NASA program because it isn't an American company, but it is collaborating on one of the contracts led by Draper Technologies in Massachusetts, expected to land on the moon in 2025.

These upcoming missions will support the U.S. space agency's lunar ambitions, shipping supplies and experiments to the surface ahead of astronauts' arrival in 2025 or later. They're also expected to kickstart a future cislunar economy, referring to the business potential of ventures on the moon and in the space between Earth and the moon.

Ispace executives watching Hakuto-R trying to land
Ispace executive leaders look on as they await word on whether the Hakuto-R lander succeeded on April 25, 2023. Credit: ispace

"The environment has changed since I established this company 13 years ago," Hakamada said. "This is a great market opportunity for a company like us."

The executive said he wasn't deterred by the uncertain outcome of the company's first attempted landing. The data will help the business prepare for its next two upcoming missions, he said.

And he had no regrets about allowing the general public to watch the attempt in real time.

"We tried to be transparent to the world. That will, we believe, (help us) gain more trust in our business and technology," Hakamada said. "Many people will be given the impression that this is real, and this will pave the way for the greater development of the cislunar ecosystem."

Which will be the first to make the journey intact? The commercial race is on, with many more opportunities approaching.

"History can be made only by those who (face) challenges, and challenges will not be possible without taking a risk," said Yuichi Tsuda, a professor of astronautical science at Tokyo University, during the live broadcast. "The risk can be taken only by those who dream. So ispace teams, you are all excellent dreamers."

This story has been updated from a previous version to include an interview with ispace CEO Takeshi Hakamada.

More in NASA

Comments

  1. If any country wants to go to the moon they must sacrifies things like , integrity and honesty that is why AMERICA can easily go there even with a kind of technology far inferior than a basic cellphone of today. There are even plans to do it again, unfortunately people are smarter now i dont know what kind of movie magic they will do this time 🤔🤔

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How about buying a few vowels 1st

      Delete
    2. you're ignorance and willingness to display it is sad

      Delete
  2. The Moon is Flat..... HAHAHA!

    ReplyDelete
  3. How about moon landings more than 50 years ago? Aren't the technologies much better now?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Technology is more sophisticated but also more sensitive. We are starting from scratch since the old technology no longer exists.

      Delete
    2. all it took was math

      Delete
  4. And deny some super intelligent people and the incredibly brave astronauts their achievements? Not on your life. And do you also believe the world is flat?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Better hire ETs. They know better lol ✌🏽

    ReplyDelete
  6. Seemed easy enough for America 50+yes ago.........😉

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. dozens of rockets exploded/were deliberately aborted to prevent catastrophes, nearly 400,000 people were involved in designing, building, testing, and flying the things and/or training the astronauts and you say it was “easy”?

      The Moon landings were hardly low-hanging fruit.

      Delete
    2. he’s being sarcastic Dude. No one has ever been to the moon. It was an elaborate hoax to trick the Russians into thinking that our technology was more advanced than it was. You crack me up. Lol.

      Delete
    3. are you really so naive you believe the Russians, who had just as sophisticated radar tracking systems, wouldn’t have ratted out the Americans if they faked it?

      You were already cracked.

      Delete
    4. We most certainly went to the moon. We spent the better part of a decade to make it happen. Engineers and scientists nationwide were devoted to making it happen.

      Delete
    5. Not easy but the greatest challenge in a generation. Took a decade but we made it happen.

      Delete
  7. Space X will come 2024 lunar mission in collaboration with NASA

    ReplyDelete
  8. Because it’s impossible 🤣no such thing as landing on the moon

    ReplyDelete
  9. Because we were told not to go back...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah...that's why. Moron.

      Delete
    2. I think the funding was cut off.

      Delete
  10. Success always comes with failure, well get next time like we did before

    ReplyDelete
  11. You can't get past the Van Allen Radiation belt this is why nobody's been to the moon...

    ReplyDelete
  12. 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

    ReplyDelete
  13. https://youtube.com/watch?v=CbFr8Hv8MdQ&feature=share

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hollywood can help you land on the moon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. just words like trajectory and Houston a lot you'll get there

      Delete
  15. Please. They got there in 1969. If you don't think we can get there again easily, I've got some great swampland to sell.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Is ok. It takes failure to achieve success. Thanks Elon now space exploration has been decentralized. New companies are emerging.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Just admit that no one has ever been to the moon ... Enough with the lies already

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aww… poor thing. Science just not within your grasp.

      Delete
    2. yae yae fk off

      Delete
    3. Sounds like F-off is what you did during science class!!! Lol!

      Delete
    4. 😂😂those classes stressed me out ...I bunked them

      Delete
  18. "because we didn't go there and that's the way it happened," Buzz Aldrin.

    ReplyDelete
  19. What do you mean likely ? It either failed or it didn’t..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They might have only lost communication with the lander it might have survived the landing.
      But most lightly not.

      Delete
  20. You don't try, you already failed. Keep trying.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It did not complete its mission however it did not fail.

      Delete
    2. What do you think I said. If you don't try, you have already failed. Get it!

      Delete
    3. But there’s more to it. They collected a boatload of data to better prepare for the next flight.

      Delete
    4. That isn't what I am saying. I am making a general statement countering what the complainers are saying that it was a failed mission. I am saying at least they tried. It didn't have the perfect outcome, but imagine if they didn't even try.

      Delete
  21. But can we see the dark side of the moon is the real test

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tested 4 years ago by China, Dude.
      https://www.history.com/.../china-plans-historic-landing...

      Delete
    2. how did I miss this

      Delete
  22. Why? We can't look after this planet. Potential rubbish dump?

    ReplyDelete
  23. there's no failure, only a learning experience

    ReplyDelete
  24. They should have gotten trumf on their team. LMFAO

    ReplyDelete
  25. 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭🎬🎦
    https://giphy.com/gifs/the-x-files-alien-aliens-xT9IgEx8SbQ0teblUQ

    ReplyDelete
  26. After a decade, still can't make it, unman, high tech?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Just admit it, no Human has never passed through the Van Allen belt and survived.

    The only thing on the Moon is Probes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you all talk or do you have proof to back up your false claims?

      I'll be waiting.....

      https://media.tenor.co/U7oRtaT1ZDkAAAAC/waiting-skeleton.gif?t=AAX6O9_a5yUKvrDMnw9QMg&c=VjFfZmFjZWJvb2s&itemid=23316859

      Delete
    2. Wrong. Nothing goes past the firmament. Operation Fishbowl proved this.

      Delete
    3. https://giphy.com/gifs/UnixUQzZBUb4I

      Delete
    4. Just for your information...... 9 Apollo missions sent humans through the Van Allen belts, and the astronauts survived just fine. The radiation levels in the Van Allen belts are high, about 1000 times higher than normal space. Still, so long as one doesn't stay in that region for a long time, one is perfectly okay.Jul 20, 2018

      Delete
    5. Just keep fighting back..if we don't, the morons that didn't get past 5th grade will take over the world. They won't use their own eyes or do their own tests, and will never stop believing they have the answers and everyone else is lying to them..The worst part is they continue to grow, and, from what they choose to believe (flat earth, firmament, aliens among us) it looks like they are only getting dumber as time goes on..

      Delete
  28. You can't land on plasma, retards.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Let's try it again folks. You'll get it next time. Good work so far 😎

    ReplyDelete
  30. Interesting read, I now wonder what the logistics to creating Lunar GPS are 🤔 To Google I go!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You'd put a bunch of satellites into orbit around the moon that would all beam radio messages down to the surface which, when picked up by a receiver on the surface, would allow triangluation to be used to determine position. Not much point in doing it, though.

      Delete
  31. I'm no rocket scientist but with today's technology aren't landers supposed to be able to bring themselves in from a certain altitude? On Earth airplanes have been able to land themselves by using autopilot for years.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Failure is a Teaching Moment. Hope their Money Guy believes that.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Or maybe American exceptionalism

    ReplyDelete
  34. You can't believe what they tell us anymore and we won't they better listen to the people that pays the Bill's and the is we!

    ReplyDelete
  35. Im reading elsewhere that the landing actually failed🤔

    ReplyDelete
  36. Yeah so is landing on the Sun…

    ReplyDelete
  37. The 'inhabitants' do not like unannounced or uninvited vistors. Just how it is....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Especially If they didn’t even know which zone they were trying to land and where to get the permit.

      Delete
  38. Still proud to have had my little part in it. Just another challenge to overcome!

    ReplyDelete
  39. Elon Musk is watching this eating popcorn 😅😅😅

    ReplyDelete
  40. Only truth is no one bene in moon

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. your conspiracy theory might be more believable if you could spell.

      Delete
  41. What's the big deal? It was just an "unscheduled rapid disassembly". I hear those are all the rage these days.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Musk can land it one tenth the price. And he doesn’t need to outsource to China.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Congratulations to them.. When you fail you learn so you can try again.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Can't be...we are new age ...how nail Armstrong can do?? Should we do better now...

    ReplyDelete
  45. We need to check if Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong were aliens or not. 🙄

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Neil A spelled backwards is Alien

      Delete
  46. Or we haven't made it yet.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Love all the moon landing deniers self identifying for a 🚫. Good day to scrub the feed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you think Mashable is going to block that many people.. ok....

      Delete
  48. Failure is an option.

    ReplyDelete
  49. They are just small private sector
    it's great start keep going

    ReplyDelete
  50. https://media1.tenor.co/images/aeade3380e9d24a0e4c0cb834758b043/tenor.gif?c=VjFfZmFjZWJvb2tfd2ViY29tbWVudHM&itemid=17130795

    ReplyDelete
  51. Their faces...! 🧐🥺🤯😳😭😢

    ReplyDelete
  52. We need tony stank.....I mean stark

    ReplyDelete
  53. https://giphy.com/gifs/hateplow-moon-hateplow-libration-3e80bmOBgeCZO

    ReplyDelete
  54. BECAUSE NO ONE HAS

    ReplyDelete
  55. https://giphy.com/gifs/snl-saturday-night-live-season-46-kIHCnKRBu3pPEN4tki

    ReplyDelete
  56. Leave it to the pros! NASA of the 60's and 70's! It all fell apart after that!

    ReplyDelete
  57. Yea that's why we haven't been their yet or maybe never.

    ReplyDelete
  58. hilarious theater

    ReplyDelete
  59. https://media.tenor.co/1c55gFUyqCcAAAAC/moon-digibyte-moon.gif?t=AAX6LjSjX1oK7DVODQwjHQ&c=VjFfZmFjZWJvb2s&itemid=18080356

    ReplyDelete
  60. this makes Savage Garden's To The Moon & Back even less believable...

    ReplyDelete
  61. Can’t get through the firmament.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Only hard if you people don't know what heck you're doing

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Stay informed!