Why landing a NASA spaceship on the moon is still so challenging | Mashable.
Why landing a spaceship on the moon is still so challenging
An artist's conception of a NASA astronaut on the moon. Credit: NASA |
At only some 1,600 feet above the moon's surface, Neil Armstrong grabbed control of the Apollo moon lander. The spacecraft's computer had guided the crew to a boulder-strewn field, so the legendary pilot had to quickly steer away. Meanwhile, errant alarms sounded in the module, and a gauge showed they would soon run out of fuel.
Thankfully, Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin touched down, and walked, on the moon in the summer of 1969. In fast succession, five more Apollo missions would land on the lunar surface over the next few years. Now half a century later, NASA aims to soon return astronauts to the moon, potentially as early as 2025. The space agency recently successfully launched its powerful new rocket, the Space Launch System, and in a pivotal test mission, an uncrewed Orion spacecraft is now orbiting the moon.
Yet landing people on the moon still remains a hugely ambitious feat.
"Just because we went there 50 years ago does not make it a trivial endeavor," Csaba Palotai, the program chair of space sciences in the Department of Aerospace, Physics and Space Sciences at the Florida Institute of Technology, told Mashable.
"It is challenging — like a lot of the things we do."
NASA has already selected the space exploration company SpaceX to build its first moon lander, and earlier this year asked other companies to propose more landers. Whatever crafts ultimately land on the moon will endure daunting, but surmountable, challenges ahead.
"It is challenging — like a lot of the things we do," Tom Percy, a lead Human Landing System engineer at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, told Mashable.
The moon has virtually no atmosphere
When spacecraft land on Earth, they use the atmosphere to slow down, as we saw when Space Shuttles and Apollo capsules returned. But the moon's atmosphere is extremely thin, comparable to the far outskirts of Earth's atmosphere, where the International Space Station orbits. This means that slowing down is dependent on firing out bounties of propellent.
"There's no atmosphere, so we cannot float down," Palotai explained. "There's nothing slowing you down except your engine."
Crucially, this gives astronauts smaller margins for error. Propellant is limited. NASA does provide enough fuel to tackle unexpected things — like a crucial flight correction — said Percy. But the mission, generally, can't afford any major mishaps.
"It's literally a one-shot thing," Palotai said.
No GPS on the moon
On Earth, aircraft rely on GPS, the U.S. government-run satellite navigation system, to provide precise landing coordinates as planes and other craft move through the sky. But there's no such satellite network encircling the moon.
"GPS doesn't work at the moon," said NASA's Percy.
So NASA must still generally navigate like they did during the Apollo missions over fifty years ago. They'll rely on the lunar lander's computers to calculate how the spacecraft must fire thrusters to stay on course for a specific landing spot on the moon. Importantly, astronauts will have the ability to take control of the craft, like Neil Armstrong did, if the system makes an error.
But today's astronauts will have significantly more help as they make their final approach. This modern technology, called "terrain relative navigation," uses a camera to map the ground during the descent. It will ensure astronauts are headed to the right place, and help the lander avoid any craters or boulders.
Accidentally landing on a boulder could be catastrophic. "There's a pretty good chance you're going to have a bad day," said Percy.
The lunar south pole is a strange, shadowy place
Apollo astronauts landed on the bright, sunlit side of the moon. But for NASA's new moon endeavors, a mission called Artemis, astronauts will land inside a crater at the lunar south pole. Planetary scientists suspect ice and other valuable resources are found in this profoundly cold, dark region.
There, the sun never passes overhead. It's always near the horizon, and can cast long shadows over the ground. These shadows will warp the view of what's below during a landing. "The long shadows make it difficult to discern what the surface looks like," noted Percy. "That's especially challenging when you're trying to land."
"It's going to be a very different environment than what astronauts experienced with Apollo," Percy added.
NASA astronauts have walked and driven on the moon. But that was long ago. Our journey to, and exploration on, the moon is still in its early stages. After all, NASA plans to colonize our chalky, cratered satellite. "We're still in the infancy of exploring the moon," said Palotai.
"We're still in the infancy of exploring the moon."
So landing on shadowy ground, without GPS or the help of an atmosphere, isn't simple. But the space agency is preparing for a continual procession of annual moon landings, starting around 2027. These endeavors, starting with a thundering blast-off from the Florida coast, will undoubtedly captivate the world, like the successful Apollo missions.
"Apollo inspired a generation of people to do something in science," marveled Palotai. "I think this will have a similar boost."
This article was originally published in April 2022 and has been updated.
More in NASA
We already know what's on the moon. Why are we spending money to go again? There's nothing there
ReplyDeletehello handsome please can you send me a friend request I'm new here
DeleteBecause the world and much of America thinks the moon landing was shot in a Hollywood Studio. We’re only been proving them right for like 47 years. Go back, prove them wrong. Now it’s looking suspicious even to me it’s this hard to do this when we supposedly could in 1969
DeleteIt's a good jumping off point for anything else we want to do in the solar system, a launch base where you're not climbing out of a 1g gravity well. Also great for radio astronomy and the like, no atmosphere in the way.
DeleteThey still won’t believe it. It’s part of their personality now.
Deleteit would make a great rocket launch platform for going further, due to the low gravity. Plus, there would be megatons of valuable minerals to mine.
Deletewe know how football games work. Yet thousands of people pay to see one every weekend.
Deletereal estate .. law of the sea applies. 1st there can claim the lot..besides there is mining .. new processes will 3Dprint/fabricate all building materials .. fuel from water on the moon .. the next stage of exploration is exploitation ..
DeleteWell, with upgrades in technology I think we can make a better demonstration of the feat than we could in 1969. Plus why not have moon amusement parks and housing , j/k. I had first learned of the hoax theory from a highly intelligent but very anti American fellow tech in a Cisco CCNA technology school. I was shocked he was so convinced but there are individuals who just have to see it in HDTV SHOT IN 4k to believe it but are logical enough that can be at least be unbrainwashed.
DeleteNot ever going back is like, in a non violent way, being King based on a war you won 50 years ago thinking you’ll never have to demonstrate yourself again to the new generations of people and you’ll maintain the same respect.
I’m all for it and at least we’re not blowing money on some stupid trial figuring out why the New Zealand rainbow specked butterfly population has lowered in the last 5 years.
Didn't Japan just try a couple weeks ago and their rocket crashed when it tried to land
ReplyDelete60 years later it's still hard to do it again regardless of technical advances! Hopeless.
ReplyDelete“Why landing a spaceship on the moon is still so challenging.” Because you’re landing. A spaceship. On the moon.
ReplyDeleteIt so funny . May be NASA is suffering from Alzheimer 🤗😂. Or their hard disk was formatted where they had recorded information to land on the moon
ReplyDeleteWe did it 54 years ago, they made it look easy with just a calculator processor and an abacus with some good math, lol
ReplyDeletedid we? 🤔
DeleteI’m untrusting of all our government dealings these days
Deletesome say it was in Arizona, but I'm sure Buzz Aldrin didn't lie when asked if the Moon landing was real or not..
DeleteI want to believe and if I had to choose I’d side with Buzz but I no longer have blind faith in our government, I even question 9/11 now.
Deletethere is definitely some shady stuff going on with the Saudis being involved. But the stuff with Ukraine and Russia and US not wanting them to win is questionable, Eisenhower said it best, be careful of the military industrial complex which really runs the country!
DeleteMaybe try one of those flying disc things. I hear there all over these days.
ReplyDeleteI'm always surprised at how many people think, this ever happened.
ReplyDeleteThe moon isn't real. It's an alien space station...
ReplyDeleteThat's contradictory information
DeleteTechnology hasn’t gotten better since we were supposedly there last so why’s it so hard in 2023?
ReplyDeletewe have better materials and proper computers but that's all. This is a bit like thinking it should be easier to run a mile now than it used to be
DeleteNo easier to run a mile now than it was 50 years ago as the human body has not changed but didn’t you just answer my question yourself? Better materials and technologies surely it makes it easier?
DeleteIt makes it lighter and more robust maybe but we still using rockets. Ok So those rockets are better controlled but it's not like landing a plane. You can see how many attempts SpaceX had to land their booster rocket on its end on earth. Earth is of course harder than the moon but it's not easy. Also this will be done on a budget! Apollo had unlimited money more or less.
DeleteFair assumptions my friend.
Deletewe forgot how to do it basically, and if we are to become a multi planet civilization, we have to start from the ground up, we made it back to space with a new age of rockets, the next step is to make it to the moon, establish a space base and launch platform then from there its easier then launching from earth, less weight and gravity to escape from
DeleteTony Stark could build this out of a few scraps in a cave.
ReplyDeleteSans Stanley Kubrick, va falloir trouver un nouveau réalisateur 😂😜🤪
ReplyDeleteFirst time is always hard😎
ReplyDeleteFirst time for everything 😉
ReplyDeleteGonna try to do it for real this time😂😂😂 what lies
ReplyDeleteNASA states clearly we can’t leave near earth orbit, Apollo astronaut states they never went, it didn’t happen 🤷🏻♂️ not my opinion just facts🙂
ReplyDeleteHahahaha
ReplyDeleteCreen qie si lo hizo en el 67???
ReplyDeleteTheres a first time for everything i suppose.
ReplyDeleteCompared to the technology it had in 69, this should be easy😉😉.
ReplyDeleteAnd Mars is 1000x harder!
ReplyDeleteIt'll still be denied by conspiracy theorists - dismissed as advanced CGI.
ReplyDeleteCause it’s never been done before.
ReplyDeletepeople actually think the moon is a celestial body orbiting earth when we informed people know what it really is.
DeleteCall SpaceX...
ReplyDeleteNever happened !!!
ReplyDeleteThere's a first time for everything. JK.
ReplyDeleteIn the sixties is wasnt a problem. Some people say it was all fake. People never been on the moon?
ReplyDeleteCause Kubrick died
ReplyDeleteAre they really going to go this time.
ReplyDeleteNASA plans to leave several BOSTON robotic dogs on the moon. With stationed solar charging stations. Along with AI printers to continue building over the years.
ReplyDeleteThis is how the BORG was born.
I would say they never went there..
ReplyDeleteProbably it will be the first time Nasa goes there....
ReplyDeleteSo they are basically admitting that they are scumbags 😆
ReplyDeleteNow why are they redundant e the moon? Are they planning on people living there?. Why exactly would they want to?.. All questions unanswered and yet they use our money to do it...
ReplyDeleteBecause you're fccking up the orbit of the moon which controls the tides and the seasons
ReplyDeleteLies, lies, lies.. NASA eat s@!t every day!
ReplyDeleteYes I'll will see santa too coming down the chimney
ReplyDeletehttps://www.cfr.org/.../what-happens-when-us-hits-its...
ReplyDeleteJust going to a dark place is what you guys can not let us hear word?
ReplyDeleteNasa tries to land on the moon while i am over the moon
ReplyDeleteSimple! Because its a lie!
ReplyDeleteBecause it never happened?
ReplyDeleteIf they can get you to believe moon landings are real, they can get you to believe anything.
ReplyDeletegO away flat earthers
ReplyDeleteThe world and much of America thinks the moon landing was shot in a Hollywood Studio. We’re only been proving them right for like 47 years. Go back, prove them wrong, do it for our honor as a nation. Now it’s looking suspicious even to me that it’s this hard to do this when we supposedly could it in 1969
ReplyDeleteOh now yall wanna start telling the truth.
ReplyDeleteWhy feeding hungry ppl is still so challenging???
ReplyDeleteAnd Biden won the election! 😂
ReplyDeleteTo speak to the aliens
ReplyDeleteAnd set up a camera that pans upward as you take off
ReplyDelete