Why landing a NASA spaceship on the moon is still so challenging | Mashable.

Why landing a spaceship on the moon is still so challenging

"It's literally a one-shot thing."

An artist's conception of a NASA astronaut on the moon. Credit: NASA

At only some 1,600 feet above the moon's surface, Neil Armstrong grabbed control of the Apollo moon lander. The spacecraft's computer had guided the crew to a boulder-strewn field, so the legendary pilot had to quickly steer away. Meanwhile, errant alarms sounded in the module, and a gauge showed they would soon run out of fuel.

Thankfully, Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin touched down, and walked, on the moon in the summer of 1969. In fast succession, five more Apollo missions would land on the lunar surface over the next few years. Now half a century later, NASA aims to soon return astronauts to the moon, potentially as early as 2025. The space agency recently successfully launched its powerful new rocket, the Space Launch System, and in a pivotal test mission, an uncrewed Orion spacecraft is now orbiting the moon.

Yet landing people on the moon still remains a hugely ambitious feat.

"Just because we went there 50 years ago does not make it a trivial endeavor," Csaba Palotai, the program chair of space sciences in the Department of Aerospace, Physics and Space Sciences at the Florida Institute of Technology, told Mashable.

 "It is challenging — like a lot of the things we do."

NASA has already selected the space exploration company SpaceX to build its first moon lander, and earlier this year asked other companies to propose more landers(opens in a new tab). Whatever crafts ultimately land on the moon will endure daunting, but surmountable, challenges ahead.

"It is challenging — like a lot of the things we do," Tom Percy, a lead Human Landing System engineer at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, told Mashable.

AD
the Apollo 11 Lunar Module
NASA astronaut Buzz Aldrin stands in front of the Apollo 11 Lunar Module in 1969. Credit: NASA / JSC

The moon has virtually no atmosphere

When spacecraft land on Earth, they use the atmosphere to slow down, as we saw when Space Shuttles and Apollo capsules returned. But the moon's atmosphere is extremely thin, comparable to the far outskirts of Earth's atmosphere(opens in a new tab), where the International Space Station orbits. This means that slowing down is dependent on firing out bounties of propellent.

"There's no atmosphere, so we cannot float down," Palotai explained. "There's nothing slowing you down except your engine."

Crucially, this gives astronauts smaller margins for error. Propellant is limited. NASA does provide enough fuel to tackle unexpected things — like a crucial flight correction — said Percy. But the mission, generally, can't afford any major mishaps.

"It's literally a one-shot thing," Palotai said.

an astronaut stepping onto the moon
An artist's conception of an Artemis astronaut stepping onto the lunar surface. Credit: NASA

No GPS on the moon

On Earth, aircraft rely on GPS, the U.S. government-run satellite navigation system, to provide precise landing coordinates as planes and other craft move through the sky. But there's no such satellite network encircling the moon.

"GPS doesn't work at the moon," said NASA's Percy.

So NASA must still generally navigate like they did during the Apollo missions over fifty years ago. They'll rely on the lunar lander's computers to calculate how the spacecraft must fire thrusters(opens in a new tab) to stay on course for a specific landing spot on the moon. Importantly, astronauts will have the ability to take control of the craft, like Neil Armstrong did, if the system makes an error.

But today's astronauts will have significantly more help as they make their final approach. This modern technology, called "terrain relative navigation,"(opens in a new tab) uses a camera to map the ground during the descent. It will ensure astronauts are headed to the right place, and help the lander avoid any craters or boulders.

Accidentally landing on a boulder could be catastrophic. "There's a pretty good chance you're going to have a bad day," said Percy.

AD
a view of moon navigation technology
An example, from an aerial view of the Mohave Desert, of how NASA's lunar "terrain relative navigation" will work. The technology matches camera images to known satellite images of the lunar surface. Credit: Draper / NASA

The lunar south pole is a strange, shadowy place

Apollo astronauts landed on the bright, sunlit side of the moon. But for NASA's new moon endeavors, a mission called Artemis, astronauts will land inside a crater at the lunar south pole. Planetary scientists suspect ice and other valuable resources are found in this profoundly cold, dark region.

There, the sun never passes overhead. It's always near the horizon, and can cast long shadows over the ground. These shadows will warp the view of what's below during a landing. "The long shadows make it difficult to discern what the surface looks like," noted Percy. "That's especially challenging when you're trying to land."

"It's going to be a very different environment than what astronauts experienced with Apollo," Percy added. 

NASA divers training in a dark environment
In preparation for astronaut training, divers at NASA's Johnson Space Center simulate the dark environments in the lunar south pole.. Credit: NASA / Johnson Space Center

NASA astronauts have walked and driven on the moon. But that was long ago. Our journey to, and exploration on, the moon is still in its early stages. After all, NASA plans to colonize our chalky, cratered satellite(opens in a new tab). "We're still in the infancy of exploring the moon," said Palotai.

 "We're still in the infancy of exploring the moon."

So landing on shadowy ground, without GPS or the help of an atmosphere, isn't simple. But the space agency is preparing for a continual procession of annual moon landings, starting around 2027. These endeavors, starting with a thundering blast-off from the Florida coast, will undoubtedly captivate the world, like the successful Apollo missions.

"Apollo inspired a generation of people to do something in science," marveled Palotai. "I think this will have a similar boost."

This article was originally published in April 2022 and has been updated.

More in NASA

Comments

  1. We already know what's on the moon. Why are we spending money to go again? There's nothing there

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hello handsome please can you send me a friend request I'm new here

      Delete
    2. Because the world and much of America thinks the moon landing was shot in a Hollywood Studio. We’re only been proving them right for like 47 years. Go back, prove them wrong. Now it’s looking suspicious even to me it’s this hard to do this when we supposedly could in 1969

      Delete
    3. It's a good jumping off point for anything else we want to do in the solar system, a launch base where you're not climbing out of a 1g gravity well. Also great for radio astronomy and the like, no atmosphere in the way.

      Delete
    4. They still won’t believe it. It’s part of their personality now.

      Delete
    5. it would make a great rocket launch platform for going further, due to the low gravity. Plus, there would be megatons of valuable minerals to mine.

      Delete
    6. we know how football games work. Yet thousands of people pay to see one every weekend.

      Delete
    7. real estate .. law of the sea applies. 1st there can claim the lot..besides there is mining .. new processes will 3Dprint/fabricate all building materials .. fuel from water on the moon .. the next stage of exploration is exploitation ..

      Delete
    8. Well, with upgrades in technology I think we can make a better demonstration of the feat than we could in 1969. Plus why not have moon amusement parks and housing , j/k. I had first learned of the hoax theory from a highly intelligent but very anti American fellow tech in a Cisco CCNA technology school. I was shocked he was so convinced but there are individuals who just have to see it in HDTV SHOT IN 4k to believe it but are logical enough that can be at least be unbrainwashed.

      Not ever going back is like, in a non violent way, being King based on a war you won 50 years ago thinking you’ll never have to demonstrate yourself again to the new generations of people and you’ll maintain the same respect.

      I’m all for it and at least we’re not blowing money on some stupid trial figuring out why the New Zealand rainbow specked butterfly population has lowered in the last 5 years.

      Delete
  2. Didn't Japan just try a couple weeks ago and their rocket crashed when it tried to land

    ReplyDelete
  3. 60 years later it's still hard to do it again regardless of technical advances! Hopeless.

    ReplyDelete
  4. “Why landing a spaceship on the moon is still so challenging.” Because you’re landing. A spaceship. On the moon.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It so funny . May be NASA is suffering from Alzheimer 🤗😂. Or their hard disk was formatted where they had recorded information to land on the moon

    ReplyDelete
  6. We did it 54 years ago, they made it look easy with just a calculator processor and an abacus with some good math, lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. did we? 🤔

      Delete
    2. I’m untrusting of all our government dealings these days

      Delete
    3. some say it was in Arizona, but I'm sure Buzz Aldrin didn't lie when asked if the Moon landing was real or not..

      Delete
    4. I want to believe and if I had to choose I’d side with Buzz but I no longer have blind faith in our government, I even question 9/11 now.

      Delete
    5. there is definitely some shady stuff going on with the Saudis being involved. But the stuff with Ukraine and Russia and US not wanting them to win is questionable, Eisenhower said it best, be careful of the military industrial complex which really runs the country!

      Delete
  7. Maybe try one of those flying disc things. I hear there all over these days.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm always surprised at how many people think, this ever happened.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The moon isn't real. It's an alien space station...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's contradictory information

      Delete
  10. Technology hasn’t gotten better since we were supposedly there last so why’s it so hard in 2023?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. we have better materials and proper computers but that's all. This is a bit like thinking it should be easier to run a mile now than it used to be

      Delete
    2. No easier to run a mile now than it was 50 years ago as the human body has not changed but didn’t you just answer my question yourself? Better materials and technologies surely it makes it easier?

      Delete
    3. It makes it lighter and more robust maybe but we still using rockets. Ok So those rockets are better controlled but it's not like landing a plane. You can see how many attempts SpaceX had to land their booster rocket on its end on earth. Earth is of course harder than the moon but it's not easy. Also this will be done on a budget! Apollo had unlimited money more or less.

      Delete
    4. Fair assumptions my friend.

      Delete
    5. we forgot how to do it basically, and if we are to become a multi planet civilization, we have to start from the ground up, we made it back to space with a new age of rockets, the next step is to make it to the moon, establish a space base and launch platform then from there its easier then launching from earth, less weight and gravity to escape from

      Delete
  11. Tony Stark could build this out of a few scraps in a cave.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sans Stanley Kubrick, va falloir trouver un nouveau réalisateur 😂😜🤪

    ReplyDelete
  13. First time is always hard😎

    ReplyDelete
  14. First time for everything 😉

    ReplyDelete
  15. Gonna try to do it for real this time😂😂😂 what lies

    ReplyDelete
  16. NASA states clearly we can’t leave near earth orbit, Apollo astronaut states they never went, it didn’t happen 🤷🏻‍♂️ not my opinion just facts🙂

    ReplyDelete
  17. Creen qie si lo hizo en el 67???

    ReplyDelete
  18. Theres a first time for everything i suppose.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Compared to the technology it had in 69, this should be easy😉😉.

    ReplyDelete
  20. And Mars is 1000x harder!

    ReplyDelete
  21. It'll still be denied by conspiracy theorists - dismissed as advanced CGI.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Cause it’s never been done before.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. people actually think the moon is a celestial body orbiting earth when we informed people know what it really is.

      Delete
  23. Never happened !!!

    ReplyDelete
  24. There's a first time for everything. JK.

    ReplyDelete
  25. In the sixties is wasnt a problem. Some people say it was all fake. People never been on the moon?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Cause Kubrick died

    ReplyDelete
  27. Are they really going to go this time.

    ReplyDelete
  28. NASA plans to leave several BOSTON robotic dogs on the moon. With stationed solar charging stations. Along with AI printers to continue building over the years.
    This is how the BORG was born.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I would say they never went there..

    ReplyDelete
  30. Probably it will be the first time Nasa goes there....

    ReplyDelete
  31. So they are basically admitting that they are scumbags 😆

    ReplyDelete
  32. Now why are they redundant e the moon? Are they planning on people living there?. Why exactly would they want to?.. All questions unanswered and yet they use our money to do it...

    ReplyDelete
  33. Because you're fccking up the orbit of the moon which controls the tides and the seasons

    ReplyDelete
  34. Lies, lies, lies.. NASA eat s@!t every day!

    ReplyDelete
  35. Yes I'll will see santa too coming down the chimney

    ReplyDelete
  36. https://www.cfr.org/.../what-happens-when-us-hits-its...

    ReplyDelete
  37. Just going to a dark place is what you guys can not let us hear word?

    ReplyDelete
  38. Nasa tries to land on the moon while i am over the moon

    ReplyDelete
  39. Simple! Because its a lie!

    ReplyDelete
  40. Because it never happened?

    ReplyDelete
  41. If they can get you to believe moon landings are real, they can get you to believe anything.

    ReplyDelete
  42. gO away flat earthers

    ReplyDelete
  43. The world and much of America thinks the moon landing was shot in a Hollywood Studio. We’re only been proving them right for like 47 years. Go back, prove them wrong, do it for our honor as a nation. Now it’s looking suspicious even to me that it’s this hard to do this when we supposedly could it in 1969

    ReplyDelete
  44. Oh now yall wanna start telling the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Why feeding hungry ppl is still so challenging???

    ReplyDelete
  46. And Biden won the election! 😂

    ReplyDelete
  47. To speak to the aliens

    ReplyDelete
  48. And set up a camera that pans upward as you take off

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Stay informed!